GOREGAON SWETAMBER MURTIPUJAK JAIN SANGH,MUMBAI vs. CIT, MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3368/MUM/2023Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 February 2024Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Accountant Member), Shri Aby T. Varkey ( (Judicial Member)3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal, considering the interest of natural justice and the trustee's medical condition, decided to grant the assessee one more opportunity to submit the required documents. The order of the CIT(Exemption) was set aside.

What were the facts?

The assessee's application for registration under section 12AB was rejected by the CIT(Exemption) for being incomplete and non-response to notices. The assessee's AR explained that the main trustee's ill health prevented compliance.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to rectify deficiencies in their application for registration under Section 12AB due to reasonable cause.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AB

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai “G” Bench, Mumbai.

Before: Shri B.R. Baskaran (AM) & Shri Aby T. Varkey (JM)

For Appellant: Shri Bharat Shah
For Respondent: Dr. Kishor Dhule
Hearing: 06.02.2024Pronounced: 07.02.2024

The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 19.4.2023 passed by the learned CIT(Exemption), Mumbai rejecting the application filed by the assessee seeking registration under section 12AB of the I.T. Act on the reasoning that the application filed by the assessee was found to be incomplete and further the assessee did not respond to the notices issued by learned CIT(Exemption).

2.

The Learned AR appearing for the assessee submitted that the main trustee of the trust is seventy five years old and further he is a heart patient. He was hospitalized in the month of June, 2023 due to heart problems and was advised bed rest. Hence he could not comply with the notice issued by learned CIT(Exemption). Accordingly, learned AR submitted that there was reasonable cause for the assessee in not responding to the notice issued by 2 Goregaon Swetamber Murtipujak Jain Sangh learned CIT(Exemption). He submitted that the Ld CIT(A) has rejected the application filed by the assessee on the reasoning that the assessee did not furnish the documents required by him. Considering the fact that the assessee is a charitable trust, the Ld A.R prayed that, in the interest of natural justice, the assessee may be provided with one more opportunity to present required documents before learned CIT(Exemption).

3.

We heard learned DR and perused the record. Having regard to the facts narrated by learned AR and in the interest of natural justice, we are of the view that the assessee may be provided with one more opportunity to present relevant details before learned CIT(Exemption) in order to enable the Ld CIT(E) to examine the application filed by the assessee seeking registration u/s 12AB of the Act. Accordingly we set aside the order passed by learned CIT(Exemption) and restore all the issues to his file with the direction to process the application filed by the assessee afresh in accordance with the law. We also direct the assessee to fully cooperate with the learned CIT(A) by furnishing all the information and explanation that may be called for by learned CIT(Exemption).

4.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced on 7.2.2024.

More judgments on Section 12AB

All 5,972 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →