SARIPUTTA CHARITABLE TRUST,CHHINDWARA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BHOPAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the order rejecting the Section 12AB registration, which was the sole basis for rejecting the Section 80G application, had been set aside. Therefore, the Tribunal found it proper to set aside the order of the CIT(E) and restore the matter for fresh decision.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Sariputta Charitable Trust, filed an application for registration under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT(E) rejected the application solely on the ground that the assessee's application for Section 12AB registration was rejected. However, this rejection order for 12AB registration was later set aside by the Tribunal.
What were the issues?
Whether rejection of Section 80G application based on a pending/rejected Section 12AB application is justified, especially when the latter order is set aside.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH “DB”, JABALPUR
Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT & SHRI, NIKHIL CHOUDHARY
PER KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT.:
This appeal, filed by the assessee, against the impugned order dated 23/12/2024 of learned Commissioner Income Tax (Exemption), Bhopal [hereinafter referred as the “Ld.CIT(E)”], rejecting the assessee’s application for registration u/s 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”), pertaining to the assessment year 2021-22. The Assessee has raised the following grounds of appeals: -
“1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) was not justified in rejecting the application in Form 10AB for registration under Section 80G of the Income T
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80G(5)
- Nikunj Mahendrabhai Adani, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-1(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2026/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1491/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1484/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026