EDWISE INTERNATIONAL LLP,MUMBAI vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE DELHI, DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2713/MUM/2023Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 February 2024AY 2020-2021Bench: SHRI BR BASKARAN (Accountant Member), SHRI ABY T. VARKEY (Judicial Member)3 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the delay in filing the tax audit report was due to a reasonable cause, considering the prevailing COVID-19 pandemic and the restrictions imposed. Therefore, the penalty levied for the delay was directed to be deleted.

What were the facts?

The assessee failed to file its tax audit report by the due date of October 31, 2020, for AY 2020-21. The reason provided was that the chief accountant and her family were infected with COVID-19, preventing timely finalization and filing of accounts.

What were the issues?

Whether the delay in filing the tax audit report due to the COVID-19 pandemic constitutes a reasonable cause for waiving the penalty under Section 271B.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 44AB,Section 271B

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “E” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI BR BASKARAN, AM & SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JM

Hearing: 07/02/2024Pronounced: 13/02/2024

स्थधयी लेखध सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AAEFE2291B (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) Assessee by: None Revenue by: Shri P.D. Chougule (Addl. CIT) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing: 07/02/2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement: 13/02/2024 आदेश / O R D E R

PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM:

1.

This is an appeal preferred by the assessee company against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, Delhi dated 28.07.2023 for AY. 2020-21 against the penalty of Rs. 1,50,000/- confirmed u/s 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter “the Act”)

2.

The brief facts we note are that the assessee had filed the return of income on 27.03.2021 for the relevant A.Y 2020-21. And the due date of filing of tax audit report (TAR) as required u/s 44AB of the Act was on 31.10.2020. Therefore, the AO initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271B of the Act. Pursuant to the show cause notice, the assessee brought to the notice of the AO that the assessee’s chief accountant Ms Rakhee Chitnis who was looking after all the accounts of assessee including the filing of income tax returns was infected by corona virus A.Y. 2020-21 Edwise International LLp., and confined to home quarantine and therefore her family members also were infected because of which she could neither finalize the accounts of the assessee for A.Y 2020-21 nor file the TAR before the due-date. However, the AO did not accept the explanation given by the assessee in the absence of medical documents and levied a penalty of Rs. 1,50,000/-. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) who was pleased to dismiss the appeal of the assessee. Aggrieved by the impugned action of the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee is before us.

3.

We note that the assessee had filed the TAR albeit late and the due date of filing of the TAR was on 31.10.2020, which was in the midst of Covid-19 pandemic; and the various State Governments had imposed restrictions on the movements of the residents based on the spread of the Corona virus. We note that the assessee has explained the reasons for not filing the tax audit report u/s 44AD of the Act within the due date i.e 31.10.2020 due to its chief accountant Ms. Rakhee Chitnis and family members being affected by the Corona virus, which is plausible. And by taking judicial notice of the situation prevalent at that time in India, we are of the view there was reasonable cause for the delay caused in filing the TAR before the due date i.e, 31.10.2020. Since there is reasonable cause for non-levy of penalty, we direct the deletion of penalty. A.Y. 2020-21 Edwise International LLp., 4. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on this 13/02/2024.

More judgments on Section 44AB

All 2,486 judgments and leading authorities on Section 44AB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →