GOBINDA KUMURA,BANGURKELA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, JHARSUGUDA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal perused the compensation order issued by Mahanadi Coalfield Limited (MCL). It noted that the entire amount of Rs. 61,73,207.39 was clearly stated as compensation for the acquisition of agricultural land, which was also the assessee's ancestral land. Therefore, this amount was not taxable.
What were the facts?
The assessee, an agriculturist, received compensation of Rs. 61,73,207.39 for the compulsory acquisition of ancestral agricultural land by Mahanadi Coalfield Ltd. The Assessing Officer treated Rs. 19,96,996.00 of this compensation as interest income and brought it to tax, citing a variation between the disclosed amount and Form 26AS.
What were the issues?
Whether the compensation received by the assessee for the compulsory acquisition of agricultural land, including ancestral property, can be treated as taxable interest income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA
Per Bench : This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order dated 3.9.2025 passed by CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in Appeal No.NAFC/2017-18/10220297 for the assessment year 2018-19. 2. Shri Anil Kumar Agarwal, ld AR appeared for the assessee and Shri Sanjib Banerjee, ld Sr DR appeared for the revenue.
It was submitted by ld AR that the only issue in this appeal was against an addition of Rs.19,96,996.00, which has been treated by the Assessing Officer as interest on the compensation awarded t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 194A
- S R P Jutha 13 Rajkot VI and Gr S Ma, Rajkot vs ITO WD 1(2)(1) Rajkot, RajkotITA 951/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Welspun Aunta Simaria Project Private… vs DCIT, Circle-78(1), DelhiITA 6559/DEL/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Lakhmanbhai Maru, Vadodara vs ITO, Ward 1(2)(1), Vadodara, Aayakar…ITA 1046/AHD/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
- Hexad Infosoft Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle…ITA 1713/BANG/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Hexad Infosoft Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle…ITA 1712/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026