M/S SAVOURITES,KOLKATA vs. PCIT-9, KOLKATA, KOLKATA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, noting the assessee's consistent non-compliance and failure to prosecute the appeal, treated the appeal as unadmitted and dismissed it.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal against an order passed under section 263 was previously dismissed for non-prosecution. The Tribunal recalled the ex-parte order and fixed the appeal for a fresh hearing. However, the assessee again failed to appear for the hearing.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeal should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to repeated non-appearance before the Tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘B’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri A.T. Varkey
Per Shri P.M. Jagtap, Accountant Member :
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-9, Kolkata dated 31.03.2016 passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
This appeal filed by the assessee was earlier dismissed by the Tribunal vide its order dated 04.08.2016 for non-prosecution as there was no satisfactory compliance on the part of the assessee to the notices issued by the Tribunal fixing the said appeal for hearing from time to time. Thereafter the assessee moved a Miscellaneous Application seeking re-call of the said order and allowing the same, the Tribunal vide its order dated 01.12.2017 passed in M.A. No. 132/KOL/2016 recalled the ex- parte order dated 04.08.2016. By the said order, the Tribunal also 2 Assessment Year: 2011-2012 directed the Registry to fix the appeal of the assessee for hearing afresh before the regular Bench in due course. Accordingly the appeal of the assessee was fixed for hearing on 30.01.2018 and the notice of the said hearing was sent to the assessee at the address given in the appeal memo by Registered Post. On 30.01.2018, i.e. today, none, however, has appeared on behalf of the assessee nor any application seeking adjournment has been filed. Keeping in view this non-compliant attitude of the assessee, we treat this appeal as unadmitted and dismiss the same for non-prosecution.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open Court on 30th day of January, 2018.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026