EON AVIATION P.LTD,PUNE vs. CIT 5, MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal as it had become infructuous. The Revenue had no objection to this request.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee later submitted a withdrawal letter stating the appeal had become infructuous.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to becoming infructuous.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “E”, MUMBAI
ORDER PER G.S.PANNU,A.M:
The captioned appeal filed by the assessee pertaining to assessment year 2010-11 is directed against an order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) by CIT -5, Mumbai dated 19/11/2014, which in turn arises out of an order passed by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3) dated 30/03/2013.
The Ld. Representative for the assessee vide letter dated 14th 2. September, 2017 has informed that the assessee does not wish to (Assessment Year 2010-11) pursue this appeal before the Tribunal as it has become infructuous consequent to the action taken by the ACIT-5(1)(2), Mumbai by passing the order under section 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Act dated 11th January, 2016.
Ld. Departmental Representative for the Revenue has no objection to the aforesaid request of the assessee.
Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 22/09/2017.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026