Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Before: SHRI G.D. AGRAWALG.D. AGRAWAL & AND BEFORE SHRI G.D. AGRAWALG.D. AGRAWAL & AND SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVASHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA
PER G.D. AGRAWAL, VP PER G.D. AGRAWAL, VP :- PER G.D. AGRAWAL, VP PER G.D. AGRAWAL, VP This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2006-07 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-VIII, New Delhi dated 22nd February, 2013.
At the time of hearing before us, nobody appeared on behalf of the assessee-appellant. On various occasions i.e., 4th November, 2013, 25th March, 2015, 28th March, 2015, 14th October, 2015 and 22nd December, 2015, the matter was adjourned at the request of the assessee’s counsel. On the last occasion also i.e., on 22nd December, 2015 the hearing was adjourned to 24th January, 2017 at the written request of the assessee’s counsel and both parties were informed in the open Court. Despite that, nobody has put in appearance on behalf of the assessee-appellant on 24th January, 2017.
2 ITA-2594/Del/2013
In view of the above, we are of the opinion that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting this appeal. While taking this view, we derive support from the decision of Delhi Bench of ITAT in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India (P.) Ltd. – [1991] 38 ITD 320 (Delhi). Accordingly, we dismiss the assessee’s appeal in limine.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed in limine. Decision pronounced in the open Court on 24.01.2017.