TRY,PATNA vs. ACIT, EXEMPTION, CIRCLE, PATNA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee did not appear for the hearing. However, after hearing the Department Representative, it was found that the assessee claimed to have submitted all required documents. The Tribunal decided to remand the issue back to the CIT(E) for re-examination.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a society, applied for regular approval under section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application. The assessee appealed the order.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) correctly rejected the grant of regular approval u/s 80G of the Act without properly considering the documents submitted by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “PATNA BENCH, PATNA
आदेश / ORDER
Per Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member:
The captioned appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 23.09.2025 passed by the CIT(Exemption), Patna rejecting grant of regular approval u/s 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’) respectively.
Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a society and an application in Form 10AB was filed by the assessee for grant of regular approval u/s 80G of the Act. The ld. CIT(E) rejected the approval u/s 80G of the Act.
Dissatisfied with the above order, the assessee has filed the present appeals before this Tribunal. At the time of hearing, the assessee did not turn up before this Bench although Registry has issued notices to the assessee. As no one turned up at the time of hearing, we cannot keep this appeal pending for inordinate period, therefore, we heard the matters with the assistance of the ld. DR.
The ld. DR supported the impugned order of the ld. CIT(E).
We, after hearing the ld. DR and perusing the materials available on record, find that the assessee has taken ground that the assessee had submitted all required documents to prove the genuineness of the activities of the society but the ld. CIT(E) failed to consider the same while rejecting the grant of regular approval u/s 80G of the Act. We, therefore, in the interest of justice and fair play, feel it necessary to remand the issue back to the file of the ld. CIT(E) with a direction to re- examine the issue afresh after giving reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. We also direct the assessee to comply all notices and submit relevant documents/details, if any required, during the remand proceedings for grant of approval u/s 80G of the Act.
In terms of the above, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026