SHEFALI MANSINGH ,UTTAR PRADESH vs. ITO, WARD-5(3)(4), UTTAR PRADESH
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण
धिल्ली पीठ “एस एम सी”, धिल्ली
श्री धिकास अिस्थी, न्याधयक सिस्य
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCH “SMC”, DELHI
BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER
आअसं.7066/धिल्ली/2025 (नि.व. 2012-13)
Shefali Mansingh,
Flat No. 201, Tower No. IC, Land Craft Golf Links,
NH-24, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201015
PAN: BAUPM-2656-P
...... अपीलार्थी/Appellant
बिाम Vs.
Income Tax Officer, Ward-5(3)(4),
Aayakar Bhawan, A-2D, Sector-24,
Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh 201307
..... प्रनिवादी/Respondent
अपीलार्थी द्वारा/Appellant by : S/Shri Sahil Sharma & Sanjay Parashar,
Advocates
प्रधििािीद्वारा/Respondent by : Shri Manoj Kumar, Sr. DR
सुिवाई की निथर्थ/ Date of hearing
:
15/12/2025
घोषणा की निथर्थ/ Date of pronouncement
:
15/12/2025
आदेश/ORDER
PER VIKAS AWASTHY, JM:
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [in short ‘the CIT(A)’]
dated 19.08.2025, for Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. The appeal is time barred by 04 days. The assessee has filed an application supported by an affidavit citing reasons causing delay in filing of appeal. After perusal of the same, I am satisfied that delay in filing of appeal is not intentional, the delay has been caused for the reasons stated in petition which appears to be bonafide. Thus, delay of 04 days in filing of appeal is condoned and appeal is admitted for decision on merits.
2
3. Shri Sahil Sharma, appearing on behalf of the assessee submits that the assessee is a Non-Resident. Notice u/s.148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) for the impugned assessment year was purportedly issued to the assessee on the basis of AIR information that the assessee has sold immovable property i.e. a Residential Flat No.1181, Tower-II, ATS Village, Plot
No.01, Sector 93A, Noida for Rs.60,00,000/- during Financial Year 2011-12. In fact, no notice u/s.148 of the Act or any subsequent notice was ever served on the assessee. The Assessing Officer (AO) completed the assessment in ex-parte proceedings making addition of Rs.45,00,000/- as Short Term Capital Gains on the sale of asset. Aggrieved by the assessment order dated 30.11.2019 passed u/s.147/144 of the Act, the assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A) explaining that husband of the assessee and the assessee were the joint owners of immovable property bearing no. Flat No. 1181, Tower No. 11, ATS Greens Village, Plot No 01,
Sector 93A, Noida, District Gautam Budh Nagar, UP. The property was sold vide registered sale deed dated 23.06.2011. The entire consideration of Rs.60,00,000/- was received by the assessee’s husband in his bank account, hence, no addition could have been made in the hands of the assessee with regard to capital gains on sale of said property. To substantiate his submissions the ld. Counsel referred to the bank account statement of Shri Yash Mansingh at pages 23 to 46 of the paper book. The amounts credited in the bank account of the assessee’s husband reconciles with the consideration mentioned in the registered sale deed. The husband of the assessee has reflected the said sales in his return of income. Hence, no addition could have been made in the hands of the assessee.
4. Shri Manoj Kumar, representing the department vehemently defended the impugned order and prayed for upholding the same.
3
5. Both sides heard. The short issue in the present appeal is with respect to the addition of Rs.45,00,000/- on account of capital gains on sale of immovable property. It is evident from the sale deed placed on record at page no.47 to 69 of the paper book that the assessee is a co-owner of immovable property bearing no.
Type “B”, 8th Floor Dwelling Unit/Flat No. 1181, Situated III Tower No. 11, ATS
Greens Village, Plot No 01, Sector 93A, Noida, District Gautam Budh Nagar, UP. The said property is jointly owned by the assessee with her husband Shri Yash
Mansingh. A perusal of the sale deed shows that the said property was sold for a consideration of Rs.60,00,000/- and sale consideration was paid in following manner:-
Mode of payment
Dated
Amount
By Ch. No. 4653467 7/4/11 Rs.17,00,000/-
Drawn on S.B.I. Kavi Nagar, Ghaziabad.
By RTGS NO. SBINH11111307694
Rs.13,00,000/-
By S.B.I. Ghaziabad,
By D.D. No. 253054 18/6/11 Rs. 30,00,000/-
Drawn on ICICI Bank Ltd., Mumbai BR.
The said sale consideration is stated to have been entirely credited in the bank account of assessee’s husband. Bank statement of the assessee’s husband Shri Yash Mansingh is available on record at pages 23 to 46 of the paper book. On perusal of the bank statement it is evident that the aforesaid amounts have been credited in the CITI Bank account of Shri Yash Mansingh on following dates:
Date
Amounts
04.20211 Rs.17,00,000/-
04.2011 Rs.13,00,000/-
07.2011 Rs.30,00,000/- Rs.60,00,000/-
Since, the entire amount has been credited in the bank account of assessee’s husband and the same has been offered to tax by the assessee‘s husband no 4 addition in the hands of the assessee of the same amount can be made. Hence, the addition made by the AO on wrong presumption of facts is directed to be deleted. 8. In the result, impugned order is set aside and appeal of the assessee is allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on Monday the 15th day of December, 2025. (VIKAS AWASTHY)
न्यानयक सदस्य/JUDICIAL MEMBER
धिल्ली/Delhi, ददिांक/Dated 15/12/2025
NV/-
प्रतिलिपि अग्रेपििCopy of the Order forwarded to :
1. अपीलार्थी/The Appellant ,
2. प्रनिवादी/ The Respondent.
3. The PCIT/CIT(A)
4. ववभागीय प्रनिनिथि, आय.अपी.अथि., दिल्ली /DR, ITAT, धिल्ली
5. गार्ड फाइल/Guard file.
BY ORDER,
////
(Asstt.