RAOUL S. THACKERSEY,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT 12(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the surplus realized on redemption of NCDs is in the nature of interest income and not capital gains. Consequently, the assessee is not eligible for deductions under sections 54F and 54EC.
What were the facts?
The assessee declared long-term capital gains on the redemption of Non-Convertible Debentures (NCDs) and claimed deductions under sections 54F and 54EC. The Assessing Officer (AO) rejected the section 54F deduction due to non-compliance with conditions, while the CIT(A) held the surplus as interest income from other sources.
What were the issues?
Whether the surplus on redemption of NCDs is taxable as capital gains or interest income, and consequently, whether deductions under sections 54F and 54EC are allowable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(5)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Union Tyres135 citing240 ITR 556 · 1999 · HC
- Anarkali Sarabhai v. CIT22 citing90 Taxmann 509 · 1997 · SC
- 102 ITD 1233 citing102 ITD 123 · ITAT
- ACIT v. Cleta Real Estate (P) Ltd.3 citing145 Taxmann.com 76
- Sath Gwaldas Mathurdas Mohata Trust v. CIT3 citing33 Taxmann 328
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai “D” Bench, Mumbai.
Before: Justice (Rtd.) C.V. Bhadang & Shri B.R. Baskaran (AM)
Per B.R.Baskaran (AM) :-
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 24-03- 2015 passed by Ld CIT(A)-28, Mumbai and it relates to the assessment year 2010-11. The grounds of appeal urged by the assessee give rise to the following issues:-
(a) Whether the surplus realized by the assessee on surrender of Non Convertible Debenture (NCD) upon its redemption on maturity would give rise to Long term Capital gains or Income from other sources?
(b) If it is held as “income from other sources”, whether the surplus amount should be Rs.9.08 crores or Rs.12.59 crores?
(c) If it is held as “Long term Capital gains”, whether the assessee’s c
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 54F
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
- Nand Kishore Agarwal, Hyderabad vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-7(3), Hyderabad.ITA 2101/HYD/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Jaipal Jona, Hyderabad vs DCIT, Central Circle-3(3), HyderabadITA 1889/HYD/2025[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Renu Arun Talwar, Mumbai vs Circle 17(1), MumbaiITA 204/MUM/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026