MUKESH B. BAJAJ,MUMBAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICER /NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE.DELHI, MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal ex-parte due to the assessee's non-appearance despite multiple notices. However, considering the principles of natural justice and the assessee's claim of having a good case on merits with supporting evidence, the Tribunal decided to set aside the CIT(A)'s order.
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in real estate, had cash deposits of Rs. 14,38,000 and term deposits of Rs. 22,00,000 in Kotak Mahindra Bank during FY 2011-12. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions of Rs. 14,38,000 and Rs. 22,00,000 as unexplained money/investments under Sections 69A and 69 of the Act, respectively, after initiating reassessment proceedings.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal ex-parte, and whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to present their case with evidence, particularly regarding the additions made under Sections 69 and 69A of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144,Section 250,Section 69A,Section 69,Section 234A,Section 234B,Section 234C,Section 148,Section 142(1),Section 133(6)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE & MS. PADMAVATHY S
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, स�या�पत ��त //True Copy// 1.
( Asst. Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026