Facts
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) which confirmed the assessment order. The CIT(A) had dismissed the assessee's appeal for non-prosecution after multiple notices and no response from the assessee. The assessee had initially challenged the addition of Rs. 24,00,000/- made by the AO for the purchase of a flat.
Held
The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal ex-parte due to the assessee's non-appearance despite opportunities. However, considering the principles of natural justice, the Tribunal decided to provide one more opportunity to the assessee to present their case.
Key Issues
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal for non-prosecution without considering the merits, and if the assessee should be granted another opportunity to present their case.
Sections Cited
143(3), 250, 148, 147, 144B, 151, 69
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE & MS. PADMAVATHY S
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, स�या�पत ��त //True Copy//
Deepak Manaji Bhosale, Mumbai. - 8 -
1.
( Asst. Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai