MACROTECH DEVELOPERS LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL RANGE-7(3), MUMBAI
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “D”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “D”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.4264/M/2023 Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/s. Macrotech Developers Limited, Deputy Commissioner of 412, Floor-4, Income Tax, 17G Vardhaman Chamber, Central Range-7(3), Vs. Room No.655, 6th Floor, Cawasji Patel Road, Horniman Circle, Fort, Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai – 400 001 Maharshi Karve Road, PAN: AAACL1490J Mumbai - 400020 (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Assessee by : Shri Sahil Shah, A.R. Revenue by : Smt. Sanyogita Nagpal, D.R. Date of Hearing : 30 . 04 . 2024 Date of Pronouncement : 30 . 04 . 2024 O R D E R Per : Narender Kumar Choudhry, Judicial Member: This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 31.03.2022, impugned herein, passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (in short Ld. Commissioner) under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) for the A.Y. 2013-14.
At the outset, both the parties have submitted that there is inadvertent mistake apparent from impugned order, as the Ld.
ITA No.4264/M/2023 2 M/s. Macrotech Developers Limited Commissioner has decided the appeal against the order dated 30.12.2016 passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) under section 143(3) of the Act on the ground that the Assessee has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme in this case, whereas the assessee never opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme in this case. 3. In fact, the Assessee during the pendency of appeal before the Ld. Ld. CIT(A)-49, Mumbai against the assessment order dated 24.12.2019 under section 153C read with section 147 of the Act , has opted for VSV Scheme and paid the relevant taxes and Revenue Department issued Form no 3 and 5 which were taken into consideration the said Ld. CIT(A) who, vide order dated 14.12.2021, dismissed the appeal of the assessee as dismissed as withdrawn on the ground that the assessee has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. 4. Therefore, inference can be drawn that the Ld. Commissioner while passing the impugned order which is under consideration, may have taken into consideration availing the VSV Scheme in the case emanated from Assessment order dated 24.12.2019 u/s 153C read with section 147 of the Act. And therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set aside, as the assessee never opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme in the instant case relevant to the assessment order dated 30.12.2016 u/s 143(3) of the Act. 5. Considering the peculiar facts and circumstances stated above, the impugned order is set aside and the case is remanded to the file of the Ld. Commissioner for decision on merits, suffice to say by affording reasonable opportunity to the assessee.
ITA No.4264/M/2023 3 M/s. Macrotech Developers Limited
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 30.04.2024.
Sd/- Sd/- (GIRISH AGRAWAL) (NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
* Kishore, Sr. P.S.
Copy to: The Appellant The Respondent The CIT, Concerned, Mumbai The DR Concerned Bench //True Copy//
By Order
Dy/Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, Mumbai.
