DBG LEASING AND HOUSING LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. ITO-7(1), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal agreed that the NCLT's approval of the Resolution Plan extinguishes all claims predating it, including statutory dues. Therefore, the appeal became infructuous.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal arose from an income tax assessment. The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) approved a Resolution Plan for the assessee company. The assessee contended that all prior period liabilities, including tax demands, were extinguished by this approval.
What were the issues?
Whether tax liabilities predating the approval of a Resolution Plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code are extinguished by operation of law.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 143(3),Section 31(1),Section 7,Section 29A,Section 30(2),Section 14
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- 33 citing
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “B’’ : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY
PER MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT :
This appeal by the assessee is arising out of the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-15, New Delhi in Appeal No. 76/18-19 dated 05.08.2019. Assessment was framed by the ITO, Ward 7(1), New Delhi for the assessment year 2008-09 u/s. 147/143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) vide order dated 30.03.2016. 2. At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee filed copy of order of NCLT, New Delhi Bench-V passed in I.A/6308/ND/2023 in CP (IB) No. 242/ND/2021 dated 13.06.2025. Ld. Counsel for the assessee stated that Resolution Plan is approved by the NCLT in its aforesaid order vide para nos. 11 to
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026