VALECHA BADWANI SENDHWA TOLLWAYS LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ADDL JCIT (A), DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 829/MUM/2024Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 June 2024AY 2013-14Bench: JUSTICE (RETD.) C V BHADANG, HON'BLE (President), SHRI B.R. BASKARAN (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the revision order, which formed the basis for the impugned assessment order, had been set aside by a previous order of the Tribunal. Consequently, the assessment order and the appellate order passed by the CIT(A) would not survive.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal challenging an order related to the assessment year 2013-14. The impugned assessment order was passed to give effect to a revision order. This revision order was previously challenged by the assessee and set aside by the Tribunal.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessment order passed to give effect to a revision order that has been set aside by the Tribunal is sustainable.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 263

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “F”, MUMBAI

Before: JUSTICE (RETD.) C V BHADANG, HON’BLE& SHRI B.R. BASKARAN

For Respondent: Shri Jagdish Jangid –CIT-DR
Hearing: 03/06/2024Pronounced: 03/06/2024

PER B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :

1.

The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 27-12-2023 passed by Ld Addl/JCIT (A), Delhi and it relates to the assessment year 2013-14.

2.

None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, from the facts narrated by Ld D.R, we noticed that this appeal could be disposed of ex-parte, without presence of the assessee.

3.

We heard Ld D.R and perused the record. The impugned assessment order has been passed by the assessing officer u/s 143(3) r.w.s 263 of the Act in order to give effect to the revision order dated 21.3.2018 passed by Ld PCIT-11, Mumbai u/s 263 of the Act. The Ld D.R fairly submitted that the above said revision order was challenged by the assessee before the ITAT and the same was numbered as ITA No.2848/Mum/2018. He further submitted that the Tribunal has disposed of the above said appeal by its order dated 23.04.2019 allowing the appeal of the assessee, meaning thereby, the revision order dated 21.3.2018 has been set aside.

4.

We noticed that the Ld CIT(A) was constrained to dismiss the appeal of the assessee, since the assessee did not respond to the notices issued by him. However, it has been brought to our notice that the impugned assessment order has been passed in order to give effect to the revision order passed by Ld PCIT u/s 263 of the Act and the said revision order has been set aside by the Tribunal, vide its order dated 23.04.2019 passed in ITA No.2848/Mum/2018. In the above mentioned facts, the impugned assessment order passed by the AO and appellate orderpassed by Ld CIT(A) will not survive in the eyes of law.

5.

In view of the foregoing discussions, we quash the orders passed by the tax authorities.

6.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.

More judgments on Section 263

All 13,616 judgments and leading authorities on Section 263 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →