THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIT (A) vs. M/S NAVODAYA GRAMA VIKAS CHARITABLE TRUST
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court noted that the issue was covered by a prior decision where a similar appeal by the Revenue against the same trust was dismissed. Therefore, the current appeal was also dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court against an ITAT order. The respondent trust argued that the issue was covered by a previous High Court decision concerning the same trust. The Revenue did not refute this submission.
What were the issues?
Whether the current appeal is covered by a previous High Court judgment concerning the same assessee and similar issues.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
- 1 -
ITA No. 121 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T G SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 121 OF 2020 BETWEEN: 1. THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIT (A), CENTRAL CIRCLE, C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE – 1, C.R.BUILDING, ATTAVARA, MANGALURU - 575 001. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. ARAVIND K V., STANDING COUNSEL) AND: 1. M/S. NAVODAYA GRAMA VIKAS CHARITABLE TRUST, 14-7-1005, SDCC BANK LTD., HEAD OFFICE BUILDING, KODIALBAIL, MANGALURU - 575 003. PAN NO.AAATN7594E. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.CHANDRASEKHAR V., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by MALA K N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
ITA No. 121 of 2020
THIS ITA UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 29/01/2020 PASSED IN ITA NO.1109/BANG/2018, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN ITA NO.1109/BANG/2018 DATED 29/01/2020 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010 AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY P.S. DINESH KUMAR J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Shri. Chandrasehkar, learned advocate for the respondent submits that the issue involved in this appeal is covered by the decision in Principal Commissioner of income Tax Vs. M/s. Navodaya Grama Vikas Charitable Trust1 and this Court has dismissed the said appeal vide order dated 15.11.2022.
The said submission is not refuted by Shri.Dilip, learned advocate for the Revenue.
1 ITA No.99 of 2020
- 3 -
ITA No. 121 of 2020
In view of the above, this appeal stands dismissed.
No costs.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 59
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026