DCIT - 7(1)(1), MUMBAI, AAYKAR BHAVAN, MUMBAI vs. MORESHWAR TRADING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The corrigendum corrects a typographical error in the original order. Specifically, it rectifies an amount mentioned in paragraphs 10 and 20 of the order.
What were the facts?
The case involves an appeal and a cross-objection concerning Assessment Year 2012-13. The original order was dated 30.05.2025 and the corrigendum was issued on 11.06.2024.
What were the issues?
Correction of a typographical error regarding a monetary amount in the appellate order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai “D” Bench, Mumbai.
Before: Shri Prashant Maharishi (AM) & Shri Sunil Kumar Singh (JM)
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
In above ITA & CO order dated 30.5.2025 a typographical error has crept in, same is corrected as under :- “At para No. 10 (page No. 8 of the order) and at para No. 20 (page No. 19 of the order) the correct amount is Rs. 60,000/- instead of Rs. 60,00,000/-.”
Above order is corrected to the above extent and hence this corrigendum passed on 11- 06-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026