DCIT CC-4(3), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. CASCADE HOLDINGS PVT LTD, MUMBAI

The Revenue has filed these appeals challenging the orders passed by learned CIT(A)-52, Mumbai and they relate to the Assessment Years2012-13 and 2013-14. The Revenue is aggrieved by the decision of learned CIT(A) in deleting the penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act in these two years.

The learned A.R submitted that the assessee hadchallenged the quantum assessment orders passed for these two years by filing appeals before the learned CIT(A) and thereafter before the Tribunal. The Tribunal has since passed orders for the years under consideration in 6768 &6769/Mum/2018 against the cross appeals field by the parties on 16/03/2020. Consequent to the passing of orders by the Tribunal, the additions made by the Assessing Officer stood deleted in both the years. The learned A.R submitted that the learned CIT(A) has appreciated this fact and accordingly found that the returned income of the assessee came to be assessed by the Assessing Officer in the consequential orders passed by Assessing Officer. Accordingly, in the absence of any addition, the learned CIT(A) held that the penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be sustained.Accordingly he deleted the penalty in both the years.

The ld. Departmental Representative submitted that the Revenue has challenged the orders passed by the Tribunal in the quantum assessment proceedings before Hon’ble High Court and hence, the Revenue is required to pursue these penalty appeals to keep the matter alive.