MANTRI NIRMAN LTD,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WD-7(2)(1), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 589/MUM/2024Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 June 2024AY 2010-11Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)1 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) had passed an ex-parte order without providing the assessee an opportunity to substantiate their case. The Tribunal also noted that the Ld. DR had no objection.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against an ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A) on 20/12/2023. The assessee's counsel stated that the CIT(A) passed the order on the same day it was supposed to make compliance after receiving a notice of hearing, without giving an opportunity to present their case.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an ex-parte order without providing adequate opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 254

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘SMC’ BENCH MUMBAI

For Appellant: Mr. Prakash Jhunjhunwala
For Respondent: Ms. Kakoli Ghosh
Hearing: 25/06/2024Pronounced: 28/06/2024

आदेश / O R D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M): The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the assessee against order dated 20/12/2023 passed by ld. CIT(A) for the quantum of assessment passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s.254 of the Act. 2. Before us, ld. Counsel submitted that ld. CIT(A) has passed an exparte order and submitted that last date of notice of hearing was issued on 15/12/2023 for making compliance on 28/12/2023. However, on the same date ld. CIT(A) has passed

Mantri Nirman Ltd the order without giving opportunity to the assessee to substantiate its case.

3.

It has been pleaded before us that the matter should be restored back to the file of the ld. CIT(A) to decide afresh.

4.

Ld. DR also does not have any objection. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee is remanded back to the file of the ld. First Appellate Authority to decide the issue on merits after giving opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

5.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 28th Jun, 2024.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →