Facts
The assessee, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) manufacturing Switch Mode Power Supplies (SMPS), challenged the transfer pricing adjustments and other disallowances confirmed by the CIT(A) for Assessment Years 2013-14 to 2016-17. The core dispute revolved around the selection of comparable companies for benchmarking international transactions.
Held
The Tribunal noted that the assessee's product (SMPS) is electronic, while many comparables selected by the TPO were electrical companies. The Tribunal found that comparing electronic products with electrical products is like comparing apples with oranges.
Key Issues
Whether the comparables selected by the TPO for benchmarking international transactions were in the same line of business as the assessee's electronic products, and the validity of certain disallowances.
Sections Cited
Section 92CA(3) of the Income Tax Act, Section 40A(a) of the Income Tax Act
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “K” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, HON’BLE & SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY, HON’BLE
आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 1. ��थ� / The Respondent 2. संबंिधत आयकर आयु� / Concerned Pr. CIT 3. आयकर आयु� अपील 4. ( ) / The CIT(A)- िवभागीय �ितिनिध ,आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, मुंबई /DR,ITAT, Mumbai, 5. गाड� फाई/ Guard file. 6.
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, TRUE COPY
Assistant Registrar आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ITAT, Mumbai