ACIT INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 3 2 1 MUMBAI, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT MUMBAI vs. MCKINSEY AND COMPANY LME LIMITED, MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the tax effect in the appeal was Rs.45,13,516/-. Following CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08/08/2019, the Tribunal held that the appeal by the revenue had to be dismissed.
What were the facts?
The revenue filed an appeal against the order dated 24/01/2024 passed by the CIT(A)-57, Mumbai, for Assessment Year 2021-22. The tax effect involved in the appeal was Rs.45,13,516/-.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the revenue is to be dismissed in light of CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 due to the tax effect involved.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
IT Act sections
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “I” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, HON’BLE & SHRI RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN, HON’BLE
PER NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, AM: This appeal by revenue is preferred against the order dated 24/01/2024 by ld. CIT(A)-57, Mumbai, pertaining to AY 2021-22. 2. A perusal of the grounds taken by the revenue shows that the tax effect involved in this appeal is Rs.45,13,516/-. Therefore, this appeal by the revenue has to be dismissed in light of the CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08/08/2019. I.T.A. No. 1817/Mum/2024 2
In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in the Court on 18th July, 2024 at Mumbai. (RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai, Dated 18/07/2024 *SC SrPs *SC SrPs *SC SrPs *SC SrPs
आदेश की "ितिलिप अ"ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ" / The Appellant
""थ" / The Respondent 2. संबंिधत आयकर आयु" / Concerned Pr. CIT 3. आयकर आयु" अपील
( ) / The CIT(A)- िवभागीय "ितिनिध ,आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, मुंबई /DR,ITAT, Mumbai, 5. गाड" फाई/ Guard file. 6. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026