EMIRATES,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAX), CIRCLE-2(2)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's application for withdrawal and the reasons provided. The assessee explicitly stated that the withdrawal should not be construed as acceptance of the order or as a precedent.
What were the facts?
The assessee preferred an appeal against an order dated 31/10/2023. The assessee moved an application to withdraw the appeal, stating that while they believed they had a good case on merits concerning articles of the UAE DTAA, the tax effect was only Rs. 2.67 lakhs.
What were the issues?
The appeal was withdrawn by the assessee due to a small tax effect, despite believing in the merits of the case regarding the UAE DTAA.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “I” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, HON’BLE & SHRI RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN, HON’BLE
PER NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, AM:
This appeal by assessee is preferred against the order dated 31/10/2023, framed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Act pertaining to AY 2021-22. 2. The assessee moved an application dt. 17/07/2024 which interalia reads as under:- “……….. The Appellant would like to submit that it believes it has a good case on merits on various propositions challenging the action of the Ld. DCIT on Article 3 of the UAE DTAA and also, on Article 5 and Article 7 of India-UAE DTAA. However, the tax effect on the issues involved is just Rs. 2.67 lakhs in total. In order to buy peace of mind and considering the relative smallness of the amounts involved, the Appellant has decided to withdraw the captioned appeal filed before the Hon'ble Tribunal against the final assessment order.
Be that as it may, it is most humbly submitted that the withdrawing of the captioned appeal should not be construed as an acceptance of the order of the Ld. DCIT on the merits of the issue. The Appellant reserves its right to litigate on similar issues in case of any other assessment year or proceedings should the need arise. The withdrawal of the appeal shall neither be considered as acceptance of the claim/ order nor be treated as precedence against the Appellant.
In view of the above, we request Your Honours to kindly permit us to withdraw the appeal filed by us.
We trust Your Honours will accede to our request and oblige.
Thanking You,
Yours faithfully, For Emirates Authorised Signatory CC: The learned Departmental Representative 'I' Bench.”
Noting the contents of the application, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn for the reasons mentioned in application (supra).
In the result appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced in the Court on 18th July, 2024 at Mumbai. (RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai, Dated 18/07/2024 *SC SrPs *SC SrPs *SC SrPs *SC SrPs आदेश की "ितिलिप अ"ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ" / The Appellant
""थ" / The Respondent 2. संबंिधत आयकर आयु" / Concerned Pr. CIT 3. आयकर आयु" अपील
( ) / The CIT(A)- िवभागीय "ितिनिध ,आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, मुंबई /DR,ITAT, Mumbai, 5. गाड" फाई/ Guard file. 6. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- Vandemataram Projects Private Limited vs. Raipur Development AuthorityChhattisgarh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Surya Prakash Aroma vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 27 Oct 2026