TEAM COLOURS FOUNDATION,VADLAMURU vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, RAJAHMUNDRY
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessment order nowhere mentioned that the registration u/s 12AB was cancelled. The CIT(A) proceeded under the wrong presumption that the registration was cancelled, which was incorrect as no such cancellation order was available. The argument of the appellant's AR was found to be correct.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was filed against the order of the CIT(A) which confirmed the addition made by the AO. The AO had selected the case for cancellation of registration u/s 12A/12AB, as the registration u/s 80G(5) was rejected. The assessment order showed total receipts of Rs.46,270/- and expenditure of Rs.80,128/-, with the total expenditure exceeding total receipts.
What were the issues?
Whether the cancellation of registration u/s 12AB was validly done by the authorities and if voluntary contributions should be treated as donations and expenditure reduced from income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- 12A(1); UP Forest Corporation &Ors. v. CIT36 citing297 ITR 1 · 2008 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam “SMC” Bench, Visakhapatnam
PER OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA, A.M : This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi in DIN & Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1081351778(1) dated 30.09.2025, pertaining to the assessment year 2023-24. 2 Team Colours Foundation
In the above cited assessee
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026