SHRI RAM GAUSHALA GAU SEVA SAMITI,NAGAUR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION),, JAIPUR
Facts
The assessee filed appeals challenging the rejection of their application for registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act. The counsel for the assessee submitted an application for withdrawal of these appeals, stating that the client wished to withdraw the said appeals which were pending.
Held
The learned Counsel of the assessee requested to withdraw the appeals. The Ld. CIT DR had no objection to the request of the AR. Accordingly, all three appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
Key Issues
Whether the appeals filed by the assessee are to be dismissed as withdrawn on their request.
Sections Cited
12AB of the Income Tax Act
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR.
Before: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Honble, & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, Honble
CIT (Exemption), Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur 302015. Shri Rajesh Kumar Bhawsinghka, Advocate Shri O.P. Meena (CIT-DR) 05.03.2025. 17/3/2025 Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, A.M.: These appeals by the assessee are directed against the separate order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur (hereinafter referred to "the CIT Exemption"] challenging therein rejection of their application for registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act (In short 'the act').
At the outset, the learned Counsel of the assessee, Sh. Rajesh Kumar Bhawsinghka submitted separate application on 05.03.205, for withdrawal of the captioned appeals, stating therein identical facts that "However my client now visits to withdraw the sad appeal which is currently pending before your honourable bench." One of the applications filed in respect of ITA No.296 Jodh 2024 is reproduced for ready reference as under: 05/03/2015- The