SAIFEE HOSPITAL AND NURSHING HOME,CRAWFORD MARKET vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), MUMBAI, CUMBALLA HILL

PDF · subscribers
ITA 613/MUM/2024Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 July 2024AY 2024-2025Bench: SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT (Accountant Member), SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH ( (Judicial Member)1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the CIT(E) had correctly rejected the application as it was filed under the incorrect provision. However, the CIT(E) had granted liberty to the assessee to reapply in the prescribed format.

What were the facts?

The assessee, Saifee Hospital and Nursing Home, had applied for regularization of its provisional registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT(E) rejected this application because it was filed under the wrong section of the Act.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee's application for regularization of provisional registration was filed under the correct section of the Income Tax Act.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AB,Section 12A,Section 12(1)(ac)(iii),Section 12(1)(ac)(iv),Section 11

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “F” MUMBAI

Before: SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT & SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH

For Appellant: Mr. Ankush Kapoor, CIT-DR
Pronounced: 24/07/2024

This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against order dated 05.12.2023 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption), Mumbai [in short ‘the Ld. CIT(E)’] wherein the regularization of the provisional registration has been rejected.

Saifee Hospital and Nurshing Home Saifee Hospital and Nurshing Home 2 ITA No. 613/MUM/2024

2.

We have heard rival submission of the parties and perused the have heard rival submission of the parties and perused the have heard rival submission of the parties and perused the relevant material on record. We find that the Ld. CIT(E), Mumbai relevant material on record. We find that the Ld. CIT(E), Mumbai relevant material on record. We find that the Ld. CIT(E), Mumbai has rejected the application of the assessee for regularization of the has rejected the application of the assessee for regularization of the has rejected the application of the assessee for regularization of the provisional registration in view of application filed under wrong provisional registration in view of application filed under w provisional registration in view of application filed under w section of the Income section of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’). However, the tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’). However, the Ld. CIT(E) has given liberty to the assessee to reapply in prescribed liberty to the assessee to reapply in prescribed format. The relevant finding of the Ld. CIT(E) is reproduced as format. The relevant finding of the Ld. CIT(E) is reproduced as format. The relevant finding of the Ld. CIT(E) is reproduced as under:

“1. M/s Saifee Hospital and Nurshing 1. M/s Saifee Hospital and Nurshing Home [hereafter 'the applicant' or Home [hereafter 'the applicant' or 'the assessee'] filed application in Form 10AB seeking registration under 'the assessee'] filed application in Form 10AB seeking registration under 'the assessee'] filed application in Form 10AB seeking registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act[hereafter 'the Act']. section 12AB of the Income Tax Act[hereafter 'the Act']. The applicant The applicant has been granted Provisional Registration under has been granted Provisional Registration under Section 12A of the Act Section 12A of the Act in Form 10AC.

2. As the trust is trust is provisionally registered provisions of section provisionally registered provisions of section 12(1)(ac)(iii) are 12(1)(ac)(iii) are applicable to it, which is reproduced as under: applicable to it, which is reproduced as under: "(iii) where the trust or institution has been provisionally ) where the trust or institution has been provisionally ) where the trust or institution has been provisionally registered under section 12AB, at least six months pr registered under section 12AB, at least six months pr registered under section 12AB, at least six months prior to expiry of period of the expiry of period of the provisional registration or within six provisional registration or within six months of commencement of its activities, whichever is earlier;". months of commencement of its activities, whichever is earlier;". months of commencement of its activities, whichever is earlier;".

3. On perusal of the From 10AB filed by the assesseeit was observed 3. On perusal of the From 10AB filed by the assesseeit was observed 3. On perusal of the From 10AB filed by the assesseeit was observed that the assessee has applied under section 12(1)(a that the assessee has applied under section 12(1)(ac)(iv) i.e.where c)(iv) i.e.where registration of the trust or institution has become inoperative due to the registration of the trust or institution has become inoperative due to the registration of the trust or institution has become inoperative due to the first proviso to sub first proviso to sub-section (7) of section 11 and not for regularisation of section (7) of section 11 and not for regularisation of provisional registration. Hence this Application is hereby rejected provisional registration. Hence this Application is hereby rejected provisional registration. Hence this Application is hereby rejected 4. However, this re 4. However, this rejection will not adversely impact the provisional jection will not adversely impact the provisional registration under section 12AB issued by the CPC. The assessee is at registration under section 12AB issued by the CPC. The assessee is at registration under section 12AB issued by the CPC. The assessee is at liberty liberty liberty to to to reapply reapply reapply in in in Form Form Form 10AB 10AB 10AB along along along with with with all all all necessary necessary necessary documents/enclosures as prescribed in Rule 17(2) of the Income Tax documents/enclosures as prescribed in Rule 17(2) of the Income Tax documents/enclosures as prescribed in Rule 17(2) of the Income Tax Rules.

5.

For statistical purposes, this application is non maintainable and For statistical purposes, this application is non maintainable and For statistical purposes, this application is non maintainable and stands rejected. stands rejected. Venkata Pavana Kumar Chanda Venkata Pavana Kumar Chanda CIT (Exemptions), Mumbai” CIT (Exemptions), Mumbai”

Saifee Hospital and Nurshing Home Saifee Hospital and Nurshing Home 3 ITA No. 613/MUM/2024 2.1 In view of that the assessee has already been granted liberty to the assessee has already been granted liberty to the assessee has already been granted liberty to reapply in the prescribed format eapply in the prescribed format, we do not find any error in the any error in the order of the Ld. CIT(E) and accordingly, the appeal filed by the order of the Ld. CIT(E) and accordingly, the appeal filed by the order of the Ld. CIT(E) and accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as infructuous. assessee is dismissed as infructuous.

3.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as infructuous.

More judgments on Section 12AB

All 5,972 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →