THIRDWAVE MERCANTILE CO P. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO 2(3)(3), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the matter to the CIT(A) for de novo adjudication, emphasizing the principles of natural justice. The assessee was directed to contest their case properly.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal against a penalty order was decided ex-parte by the CIT(A) as the assessee failed to appear. The assessee contended that they could not appear before the CIT(A) for bona fide reasons and sought another opportunity.
What were the issues?
Whether the ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A) violated the principles of natural justice and if the assessee should be granted another opportunity to present their case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI D.T. GARASIA, JM & SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
आदेश / O R D E R
Per Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)
The captioned appeal by Assessee for Assessment Year [AY] 2012-13 assails the ex-parte order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax Thirdwave Mercantile Co.Pvt.Ltd Assessment Year 2012-13 (Appeals)-6 [CIT(A)], Mumbai dated 29/07/2016 qua confirmation to penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for Rs.1,83,482/-.
Facts leading to the same are that the assessee being resident corporate assessee was assessed for impugned AY u/s 143(3) on 25/03/2015 where the assessee suffered certain addition u/s 69C for Rs.5,56,005/-. Consequently, penalty proceedings were initiated in the quantum assessment and the assessee has been saddled with impugned penalty vide penalty order dated 30/09/2015. 3. Aggrieved, the assessee contested the same without any success before Ld. CIT(A) where assessee failed to make any representation which resulted into the issue being decided ex-parte qua the assessee. Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before us. 4. The Ld. Counsel for assessee [AR], at the outset, raised the issue of principal of natural justice by contending that the order of the first appellate authority was an ex-parte order since the assessee, for bona fide reasons, could not contest the same before Ld. CIT(A) and therefore, another opportunity be provided to the assessee. Ld. DR opposed the same on the ground that adequate opportunity was provided to the assessee and therefore, the assessee, at this stage, is debarred from taking this plea. 5. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the relevant material on record. It is settled law that principles of natural justice and fair play require that the effected party is granted sufficient opportunity of being heard to contest his case. Therefore, without delving much deeper into the merits of the case, in the interest of justice, we restore the Thirdwave Mercantile Co.Pvt.Ltd Assessment Year 2012-13 matter back to Ld.CIT(A) for de novo adjudication after affording sufficient opportunity of being heard to the assessee, who in turn, is also directed to contest his stand forthwith. 6. Resultantly, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes on legal grounds. Order pronounced in the open court on 04th October, 2017.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026