Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH : KOLKATA
Before: Hon’ble Shri Aby. T. Varkey, JM & Shri M.Balaganesh, AM ]
For the Appellant : Shri Arindam Bhattacharjee, Addl. CIT For the Respondent : None Date of Hearing : 22.02.2018 Date of Pronouncement : 07.03.2018 CORRIGENDUM ORDER
Per M. Balaganesh, AM
This appeal was disposed off by this Tribunal on 07.03.2018 wherein the ground raised by the Revenue was allowed following the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Hooghly Mills Co. Ltd. in Civil Appeal No. 5149 of 2006 dated 22.11.2006. But in the last line of the order that is in para 7 it was wrongly mentioned that ‘The appeal of the revenue is dismissed’ instead of stating ‘The appeal of the revenue is allowed’. This fact was brought to our notice by the Ld. Senior DR on 12.03.2018 and accordingly we deem it fit to issue this Corrigendum to rectify the mistake stated as above.
We hold that para 7 of our order dated 07.03.2018 should be read as under: “7. In the result, the appeal of the revenue is allowed”.