What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal has corrected a typographical error in the assessee's address in its previous order. The correct name of the building where the assessee is located is 'Bajaj Bhavan', not 'Bahah Bhavna'.

This judgment is a corrigendum to a previous order passed by the ITAT Mumbai. It rectifies a clerical error in the address of the assessee, M/s Bajaj Auto Limited. The name of the building was incorrectly typed as 'Bahah Bhavna' and has been corrected to 'Bajaj Bhavan'.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the correction of a clerical mistake in the address of the assessee in a previously passed ITAT order.

Bajaj Auto Ltd vs Addl CIT Ltu | ITAT Mumbai 2017

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES “B”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R.C. SHARMA (AM) AND SHRI RAM LAL NEGI (JM) Assessment Year: 2009-10

M/s Bajaj Auto Limited, The Additional CIT LTU, Bajaj Bhavan, 29th Floor, World Trade Centre, 226, Nariman Point, Centre No. 1, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai - 400021 Vs. Mumbai PAN: AADCB2923M (Appellant) (Respondent)

Appellant by : Shri Kirit Kamdar Respondent by : Shri B.S. Bisht (DR)

CORRIGENDUM In the present case the Tribunal has passed order under section 254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 28.12.2016. It has come to our notice that in the said order address of the assessee has been wrongly typed as Bajaj Auto Ltd., “Bahah Bhavna”, Nariman Point, Mumbai, 400021. By way of this corrigendum, we rectify the clerical mistake and replace the words “Bahah Bhavna” by the correct words “Bajaj Bhavan”. Hence, the correct address of the assessee may be read as Bajaj Auto Ltd., Bajaj Bhavan, Nariman Point, Mumbai, 400021. (R.C. SHARMA) (RAM LAL NEGI) Accountant Member Judicial Member Mumbai: Dated 27/10/ 2017 Alindra, PS

2 Co rri g en d um -ITA N o . 4084/Mum/2014

आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अिीिार्थी / The Appellant 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent 3. आयकर आयुक्त(अिीि) / The CIT(A) 4. आयकर आयुक्त / CIT – concerned 5. तिभागीय प्रतितिति, आयकर अिीिीय अतिकरण, मुंबई / DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. गार्ड फाईि / Guard File

आदेशािुसार/ BY ORDER, उि/सहायक िुंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.

BAJAJ AUTO LTD,MUMBAI vs. ADDL CIT LTU, MUMBAI

What did the Tribunal hold?

What were the facts?

What were the issues?

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Latest GST High Court judgments