No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “SMC”, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI S.V. MEHROTRA
O R D E R PER S.V. MEHROTRA, A.M :
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order dated 09.12.2014 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Ghaziabad, u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”) relating to assessment year 2010-11.
Brief facts of the case are that assessee, a Cooperative Society duly registered with Registrar of Cooperative Society vide No.2773 dated 21.08.1997, e-filed its return of income on 26.09.2010 declaring Nil income. The Assessing Officer noticed that assessee had claimed deduction u/s 80P to the tune of Rs.22,71,949/-. In compliance to the show-cause notice, issued by the Assessing Officer, asking as to why not deduction u/s 80P may be disallowed, the assessee pointed out as under :-
“the assessee is a registered cooperative society, providing credit facility to its members, so income is deductible u/s 80P of the Act”.
3. The Assessing Officer denied the deduction u/s 80P for the following reasons :-
(a) The assessee society is registered with the Registrar of Society for receiving deposits and providing credit facility to its members. (b) The society is created for the benefit of employees of M/s Sri Ram Pistons and Rings Ltd., (c) The object of society was as under :-
From perusal of the object of society, he concluded that the society had declared itself as banking organization providing credit facility to its members. He pointed out section 80P provides the deduction in respect of income of co-operative society. Further, the Finance Act, 2006 w.e.f. 01.04.2007 had inserted section 80P(4) which provides that the provisions of this section shall not apply in relation to any co- operative bank other than a primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank”. (d) He rejected the assessee’s claim that society was registered co- operative society observing that part V of the Banking Regulations Act, 1949 defines primary agricultural credit society as under :- “Primary agricultural credit society” means a co-operative society- (1) the primary object or principal business of which is to provide financial accommodation to its members for agricultural purposes or for purposes connected with agricultural activities (including the marketing of crops);” (e) He observed that intention of legislation was to encourage co- operative activity in the rural society and community development of the agricultural society and not the activity of receiving deposits and providing credit facilities to the employees.
4. Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the assessee’s appeal by observing as under :-
“5.3 I find that in the bye laws of society, it has used the term bank/society which shows the intention of society to conduct banking transactions. I also find that the society has charged interest at the rate of 12% whereas the bank has charged interest at 10%. The profit and loss account of the society shows that it has earned interest of Rs. 82,07,335/- during the year but has paid interest of Rs. 5757555/-. Besides, it has earned a dividend of Rs. 499767/- from Bank. All these facts clearly prove that the society exists for profit making and principle of mutuality does not apply in this case. The paid capital of the society is Rs. 10293500/t and by virtue of Section 56(ccv) of Banking Regulation Act, 1949 a cooperative society other than the primary agricultural credit society would be deemed to be a "primary cooperative bank" if it fulfills following condition:- "Primary co-operative bank" means a co-operative society, other than a primary agricultural credit society- (1) The primary object or principal business of which is the transaction of banking business; (2) The paid-up share capital and reserve of which are not less than one lakh of Rupees. (3) The bye-law of which do not permit admission of any other co- operative society as a member. Provided that this sub-clause shall not apply to the admission of a co- operative bank as a member by reason of such co-operative society out of funds provided by the State Government for the purpose;"
5.4 In case of the appellant society all the three conditions are satisfied. Its primary object is banking business of taking deposits and advancing loans. Its object is to earn profit as can be seen from the difference in rate of interest charged by bank and by it. In the bye laws, there is no mention of the fact that it is open to other cooperative society except cooperative bank. The relevant clause regarding the membership in bye laws is as under :-
“The term Sewayojak” does not translate to cooperative. Thus, membership is not open to other cooperative society. Therefore, for the purpose of Section 80P(4) the society is deemed to be primary cooperative bank as per Section 56(ccv) of BRA 1949 irrespective of the fact that it has not sought or been granted license for banking. Having license is not material. This is altogether a different matter that the assessee society despite coming under definition of primary cooperative bank by virtue of Section 56(ccv) of Banking Regulation Act, 1949, it has not taken the requisite license.”
5. Ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that a co-operative society has been treated as a co-operative bank. He referred to the assessment order page 2 and pointed out that the Assessing Officer has not disputed that the assessee’s society is registered with the Registrar of Society for receiving deposits and providing credit facilities to its members. He further pointed out that it is not disputed that the society had been created for the benefit of employees of M/s Sri Ram Pistons and Rings Ltd.. Ld. counsel further referred to page 7 of Paper Book, wherein, the ld. CIT(A)’s order is contained and pointed out that he has also not disputed that the society was taking deposits from members and providing them credit facilities. Ld. counsel further referred to page 48 of Paper Book, wherein, society’s memorandum is contained, wherein, the name of assessee has been referred to as ‘M/s Sri Ram Pistons and Rings Ltd. Employees (salary owners)
Cooperative debt and credit society ltd..’ Further, scope of society is limited to the employees of M/s Sri Ram Pistons and Rings Ltd.. Ld. counsel submitted that before any co-operative society can be treated as co-operative bank, the various conditions of the Banking Regulations Act, 1949 (BRA) have to be fulfilled. In this regard, ld. counsel referred to page 33 of Paper Book, wherein, BRA is contained, and referred to section 5(b) of the same which reads as under :-
“5. Interpretation. - [In this Act], unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context, - (b) "banking" means the accepting, for the purpose of lending or investment, of deposits of money from the public, repayable on demand or otherwise, and withdrawal by cheque, draft, order or otherwise;”
With reference to above definition of banking, ld. counsel pointed out that unless the deposits of money are received from general public, the co- operative society cannot fall within the definition of banking. Ld. counsel further referred to page 39 of Paper Book and referred to section 22 of the Banking Regulations Act, 1949, sub-section (1) of which reads as under :-
“22. Licensing of banking companies - [(1) Save as hereinafter provided, no company shall carryon banking business in India unless it holds a licence issued in that behalf by the Reserve Bank and any such licence may be issued subject of such conditions as the Reserve Bank may think fit to impose.]”
7. With reference to this section, ld. counsel pointed out that unless a company holds a licence issued in regard to banking activity by the Reserve Bank of India, it cannot carry on banking business. Ld. counsel further referred to page 42 to 44 of the Paper Book, wherein, part V of the Banking Regulations Act, 1949 is contained, which deals with the application of the Act to co-operative banks. He referred to relevant sections of this section as under :-
“56. Act to apply to co-operative societies subject to modifications.-- The provisions of this Act, as in force for the time being, shall apply to, or in relation to, co-operative societies as they apply to, or in relation to banking companies subject to the following modifications, namely:-- ………. (c) in section 5,-- [(i) after clause (cc), the following clauses shall be inserted, namely:-- (cci) "Co-operative bank" means a state co-operative bank, a central co- operative bank and a primary co-operative bank;
(ccii) "co-operative credit society" means a co-operative society, the primary object of which is to provide financial accommodation to its members and includes a co-operative land mortgage bank; ………. (ccv) "primary co-operative bank" means a co-operative society, other than a primary agricultural credit society,-- (1) the primary object or principal business of which is the transaction of banking business; (2) the paid-up share capital and reserves of which are not less than one lakh of rupees; and (3) the bye-laws of which do not permit admission of any other co- operative society as a member: PROVIDED that this sub-clause shall not apply to the admission of a co- operative bank as a member by reason of such co-operative bank subscribing to the share capital of such co-operative society out of funds PROVIDED by the State Government for the purpose; (ccvi) "primary credit society" means a co-operative society, other than a primary agricultural credit society,-- (1) the primary object or principal business of which is the transaction of banking business; (2) the paid-up share capital and reserves of which are less than one lakh of rupees; and (3) the bye-laws of which do not permit admission of any other co- operative society as a member: PROVIDED that this sub-clause shall not apply to the admission of a co- operative bank as a member by reason of such co-operative bank subscribing to the share capital of such co-operative society out of funds provided by the State Government for the purpose. Explanation.--If any dispute arises as to the primary object or principal business of any co-operative society referred to in clauses (cciv), (ccv) and (ccvi), a determination thereof by the Reserve Bank shall be final;
With reference to aforementioned mandate of Banking Regulations Act, 1949, ld. counsel submitted that if the dispute arises as to the primary objects of principle business of any co-operative society i.e. a primary credit society or a co-operative bank then the dispute is to be resolved by RBI and this cannot be done by the Assessing Officer.
In view of the aforementioned sections of the Banking Regulations Act, 1949, ld. counsel submitted that ld. CIT(A) wrongly concluded that the assessee is to be deemed as primary co-operative bank as per section 56(ccv) of Banking Regulations Act, 1949 irrespective of the fact that it had not sought or being granted license for banking. Ld. counsel relied on following case laws in support of his submissions :-
(1) CIT vs. Shri Laxmi Credit Souhard Sahakari Ltd., (2016) 65 taxmann.com 96 (Karnataka), wherein the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court held as under :- “4. The question of law that arise for our consideration in this appeal are : i. Whether the benefit of deduction, under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the IT Act, could be denied to the assessee on the footing that, though the respondent was said to be a Co-operative Society, it was in fact a co- operative bank, within the meaning as assigned to such bank under Part V of the BR Act. ii. Whether the Authorities under the IT Act were competent and possessed the jurisdiction to resolve the controversy as to whether the assessee was a co-operative society or co-operative bank, as defined under the provisions of the BR Act? ………. Attention is also drawn to the relevant portion of the Finance Minister’s Budget Speech explaining the reasons for withdrawal of tax benefits to some Societies by way of insertion of sub-section 80P(4) and insertion of new sub-clause (viia) in clause (24) of Section 2 definition of “income” by the Finance Act, 2006, with effect from 1.4.2007, is as under: The Co-operative banks are functioning at par with other commercial banks, which do not enjoy any tax benefits. It is, therefore proposed to amend section 80P by inserting a new sub-section (4) so as to provide that the provisions of the said section shall not apply in relation to any co-operative bank other than primary credit society or a primary co- operative agricultural and rural development bank. It is also proposed to define the expressions “co-operative bank”, “primary agricultural credit society” and “primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank”. ………. It is also stated that in some matter, the Tribunal has granted relief by holding that Section 80P(4) is not applicable, by referring to one circular of CBDT No.133 of 2007 dated 9.5.2007 which provided as under : Subject: clarification regarding admissibility of deduction under Section 80P of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Please refer to your letter No.DCUS/30688/2007, dated 28.03.2007 addressed to the Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes, on the above given subject.
2. In this regard, I have been directed to state that sub-section (4) of section 80P provides that deduction under the said section shall not be allowable to any co-operative bank other than a primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank. For the purpose of the said sub-section, co- operative bank shall have the meaning assigned to it in part V of the Banking Regulations Act, 1949.
3. In part V of the Banking Regulation Act, “Co-operative Bank” means a State Co-operative Bank, a Central Co-operative Bank and a Primary Co-operative Bank.
4. Thus, if the Delhi Co-op Urban T and C Society Ltd. does not fall within the meaning of “Co-operative Banks” as defined in part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, sub-section (4) of Section 80P will not apply in this case.”
Insofar as the first question of law is concerned, there are a series of decisions of this court wherein it has been repeatedly answered in favour of the assessee. Two of the said decisions are as follows : 1. Sri Biluru Gurubasava Pattina Sahakari Sangha Niyamitha (supra) 2. CIT v. Bangalore Commercial Transporter Credit Society in & ITA No.599/2013. In interpreting Section 80P(4) in Sri Bilura Gurubasava Pattina Sahakari Sangha Niyamitha case (supra) of the IT Act, it was held as follows : “If a Co-operative Bank is exclusively carrying on banking business, then the income derived from the said business cannot be deducted in computing the total income of the assessee. The said income is liable for tax. A Co-operative bank as defined under the Banking Regulation Act includes the primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank. The Legislature did not want to deny the said benefits to a primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank. They did not want to extend the said benefit to a Co-operative bank which is exclusively carrying on banking business i.e. the purport of this amendment. Therefore, as the assessee is not a Co-operative bank carrying on exclusively banking business and as it does not possess a licence from Reserve Bank of India to carry on of lending money to its members which is covered under Section 80(2)(a)(i) i.e. carrying on the amendment is not to exclude the benefit extended under Section 80P(1) to such society. Therefore, there was no error committee by the Assessing Authority.” In Bangalore Commercial Transporter Credit Society (supra), this court has cited with approval the following differences between a co-operative society and a cooperative bank – as depicted by the Tribunal in tabular form thus : Nature Co-operative society Co-operative Society registered under Banking registered under Karnataka Regulation Act, 1949 Co-operative Society Act, 1959 Under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and Registration Co-operative Societies Act, Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 1959 Nature of business 1. As defined in Section 6 of 1. As per the bye-laws of Banking Regulation Act. the co-operative society.
2. Can open savings bank 2. Society cannot open account, current account, savings bank account, overdraft account, cash current account, issue letter credit account issue letter of credit, discounting bills of credit, discounting bills of exchange, issue cheque, of exchange, issue cheques, demand draft, pay orders, demand drafts (DD), Pay gift cheques, lockers, bank orders, Gift cheques, guarantees, etc. lockers, bank guarantees etc.
3. Co-operative Banks can 3. Society cannot act act as clearing agent for clearing agent, for cheques, cheques, DDs pay orders DDs, pay orders and other and other forms. forms.
Banks are bound to 4. Society are bound by follow the rules, rules and regulations as regulations and directions specified by in the co- issued by Reserve Bank of operative societies act. India (RBI) Filing of returns Co-operative banks have to Society has to submit the submit annual return to annual return to Registrar RBI every year. of Societies. Inspection RBI has the power to Registrar has the power to inspect accounts and inspect accounts and overall functioning of the overall functioning of the Bank. bank. Part V Part V of the Banking Part V of the Banking Regulation Act is Regulation Act is not applicable to co-operative applicable to co-operative banks. banks. Use of words The word ‘bank’, ‘banker’, The word ‘bank’, ‘banker’, ‘banking’ can be used by a ‘banking’ cannot be used co-operative bank. by a co-operative society. And this court had dismissed the appeal of the revenue following the decision in Sri Biluru Gurubasava Pattina Sahakari Sangha Niyamitha (supra). The same view has been taken in the following decisions : 1. Bangalore Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. (supra) 2. CIT v. Yeshwanthpur Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. in ITA 237/2012 3. CIT v. Mysore University Employees Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. in ITA 298/2013 4. CIT v. Vasavi Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. in
CIT v. Sri Vasavi Multi Purpose Souharda Sahakari Sangha Niyamitha in ITA No.505/2013 6. CIT v. General Insurance Employees Co-operative Society Ltd. in ITA No.273/2013. 10. We are in respectful agreement with the general view taken as to the interpretation of the relevant provisions of law, by the co-ordinate bench of this court, in the above and several other judgments adopting the same view. However, it is to be noticed that there is a seriously disputed question of fact which the Authorities under the IT Act have taken upon themselves to interpret in the face of the BR Act prescribing that in the event of a dispute as to the primary object or principal business of any co- operative society referred to in clauses (cciv), (ccv) and (ccvi) of Section 56 of the BR Act, a determination thereof by the Reserve Bank shall be final, would require the dispute to be resolved by the Reserve Bank of India, before the authorities could term the assessee as a co-operative bank, for purposes of Section 80P of the IT Act. Any opinion expressed therefore is tentative and is not final. The view expressed by this court, however, as to the assessee being a co-operative society and not a co- operative bank in terms of Section 80P(4) of the IT Act, shall hold the field and shall bind the authorities unless held otherwise by the Reserve Bank of India. In the result, the above questions are answered in favour of the assessee and the present appeal of the revenue is dismissed.”
2. ACIT vs. Palhawas Primary Agriculture Co-op. Society Ltd., (2012) 23 taxmann.com 318 (Delhi), wherein, the Tribunal held as under :- “Head Notes : The assessee was a registered agriculture co-operative society carrying out banking activities like borrowing, raising or taking up money and lending or advancing money for the purpose of agriculture, sale and purchase of seeds and fertilizers, etc. It was accepting deposits from non-members also. However, credit facilities and supply of seeds, urea, etc. for the purpose of agriculture were given only to the members of the assessee-society. The assessee claimed deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) and 80P(2)(a)(iv). The Assessing Officer rejected the assessee’s claim holding that income of the assessee was not attributable to the qualifying activity of carrying on the business of banking or providing credit facilities to its members and the purchase of agricultural implements, seeds, livestock or other articles intended for agriculture for the purpose of supplying them to its members as the similar activities were being performed for the non-members also. On appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) held that merely because the assessee was unable to bifurcate the expenditure for the deposits from the members and non-members, deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) and under section 80P(2)(a)(iv) could not be denied. On revenue’s appeal : The exemption under section 80P(2)(a) is available to the income of a cooperative society engaged in the business or activities facilitating to its members as mentioned in clauses (i) to (vi) of sub-section (a) of section 80P(2). As the provisions of Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act clearly states that income earned from credit facilities to members and as per sub-clause (iv), the purchase of agricultural implements, seeds, livestock or other articles intended for agriculture for the purpose of supplying them to its members, the whole of the amount of profits and gains of business attributed to any one or more of such activities are entitled for deduction. First limb of sub-clause (i) of clause (a) states that “carrying on the business of banking” and after “or” second limb states that “as providing credit facilities to its members”, therefore, it construed that income from business of banking as well as income from credit facilities
restricted to its members only are entitled for deduction and income from non- members is not included and entitled for deduction under said provisions. But in the present case, it was not in dispute that credit facilities and supply of seeds, urea etc. were given only to the members of the appellant society. Only with regard to the deposits, the appellant banking society accepted from non- members does not, in any way, affect the revenue generated by the appellant in providing credit facilities and supply of other agriculture related equipments and fertilizers etc. to its members. Banking cooperative society does not earn income from deposits but it has to pay interest on the deposits, therefore, deposits from non-members can never earn income in the hands of assessee although if out of deposits, the bank cooperative society had provided credit to its members, only then the income arising from these activities are entitled for deduction. On the basis of foregoing discussion, the AO was not justified in disallowing deduction on this sole ground that the income declared by the assessee includes income from business of banking from its non-members because there was no income from the same activities as the assessee accepted only deposits from non- members on which the assessee bank was under obligation to pay interest, therefore, these deposits from non-members, in any way, never brought any income to the assessee. Accordingly, the Commissioner (Appeals) rightly allowed the deduction and accepted the appeals of assessee societies and there was no reason to interfere with the impugned orders.”
Sikar Sahakari Bhoomi Vikas Bank Ltd. vs. ITO, (2016) 69 taxmann.com 356 (Jaipur-Trib.), wherein, the Tribunal held as under :- “22.2 The co-operative banks are functioning at par with other commercial banks, which do not enjoy any tax benefit. Therefore, section 80P has been amended and a new sub section (4) has been inserted to provide that the provisions of the said section shall not apply in relating to any co-operative bank other than a primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank. The expressions "co-operative bank", "primary agricultural credit society" and primary co-operative agricultural and rural development banki" have also been defined to lend clarity to them. The assessee is not a Cooperative Bank as per Banking Regulations Act. Cooperative Bank means "a State Cooperative Bank, a Central Cooperative Bank and a Primary Cooperative Bank." Primary Cooperative Bank as per Banking Regulations Act is as under :- "(CCV) "primary co-operative bank" means a co-operative society, other than a primary agricultural credit society.
As per this Board's Circular this amendment was applicable from A.Y. 2007-08. In assessment year 2007-08, the AO had allowed the benefit under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act in the case of assessee. This issue has been considered by the various High Courts as well as ITATs particularly in case of ACIT vs. M/s. Bangalore commercial Transport Credit Cooperative Society Ltd. in dated 8.4.2011. The operative portion is reproduced as under :- "9.3. If the intention of the legislature was not to grant deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) to co-operative societies carrying on the business of providing credit facilities to its members, then, this section would have been deleted. The new proviso to section 80P(4) which is brought into Statute is applicable only to co-operative banks and not to credit co- operative societies. The intention of the legislature of bring in co- operative banks into the taxation structure was mainly to bring in par with commercial banks. Since the assessee is a co-operative society and not a co-operative bank, the provisions of section 80P(4) will not have application in the assessee's case and, therefore, it is entitled to deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act ............". The facts being similar, the decision squarely applies." The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court also considered this issue in the case of CIT vs. Surat Vankar Sahakari Sangh Ltd. in Tax Appeal No.1150 of 2013 dated 17.01.2014. The operative portion is reproduced as under :- After considering the aims and objects of the assessee, it is held that assessee is not a cooperative bank in terms of Banking Regulations Act. The case laws relied upon by the CIT (A) are not squarely applicable on the case of the assessee. Therefore, we reverse the order of ld. CIT(A). Assessee is entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the IT Act.”
Ld. counsel further submitted that in earlier year Revenue has allowed deduction 80P and, therefore, following the rule of consisting also, the assessee should not have been denied deduction u/s 80P. In this regard, He referred to the assessment order for assessment year 2009-10 contained at page 109 of Paper Book, wherein, deduction u/s 80P had been allowed to assessee.
Ld. DR submitted that assessee was carrying on banking activity as it was receiving deposits and providing credit facilities to its members. He referred to ld. CIT(A)’s order and pointed out that it was evident from the conduct of assessee of charging interest @ 12% from its employees that it was primarily carrying on banking transactions. He submitted that the case relied upon by assessee are with reference to banking licence which is to be decided by RBI.
I have considered the submissions of both the parties and perused the record of the case. There is no dispute about the nature of activity carried on by assessee viz. providing credit facilities to its members only and not to general public. No deposits had been received from general public. The assessee had claimed deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i), however, the Assessing Officer invoked section 80P(4) holding the assessee as a co-operative bank.
Therefore, the main issue to be decided is as to whether assessee falls u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) or u/s 80P(4). The assessee society had been formed for the benefit of employees of M/s Sri Ram Pistons and Rings Ltd. and was extending credit facilities to its members/employees on the basis of cooperative principles. This was primarily for the benefit of its members only. Before coming to any conclusion, it would be useful to consider section 80P(2)(a)(i) and section 80P(4), which reads as under :-
“80P(2) The sums referred to in sub-section (1) shall be the following, namely :— (a) in the case of a co-operative society engaged in— (i) carrying on the business of banking or providing credit facilities to its members .......... “80P(4) The provisions of this section shall not apply in relation to any co- operative bank other than a primary agricultural credit society or a primary co- operative agricultural and rural development bank.” Explanation.—For the purposes of this sub-section,— (a) "co-operative bank" and "primary agricultural credit society" shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in Part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949); (b) "primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank" means a society having its area of operation confined to a taluk and the principal object of which is to provide for long-term credit for agricultural and rural development activities.
A bare reading of aforementioned section makes it clear that section 80P(2)(a)(i) uses the term ‘carrying on the business of banking’ whereas section 80P(4) uses the term ‘co-operative bank’. Explanation to section 80P(4) defines co-operative bank as meaning assigned to them in Part V of the Banking Regulations Act. This takes me to section 3 of BRA which restricts its applicability to co-operative societies as under :-
(a) a primary agricultural credit society; (b) a co-operative land mortage bank; and (c) any other co-operative society, except in the manner and to the extent specified in Part V of BRA. Thus, it is evident that to a very limited extent the BRA has been made applicable to co-operative societies. Therefore, very strict interpretation is to be made.
Now coming to section 5 of the BRA. This reads as under :-
5. Interpretation – (In this Act) unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context –
This implies that the terms defined in section 5 shall have same meaning throughout the Act unless the context otherwise requires.
Therefore, the term ‘banking’ as defined in section 5(b) cannot be understood in any other manner throughout the Act other than as defined in section 5(b), which reads as under :-
“5(b) "banking" means the accepting, for the purpose of lending or investment, of deposits of money from the public, repayable on demand or otherwise, and withdrawal by cheque, draft, order or otherwise;”
Admittedly, this condition and also other aspects, as noted above, in ld. counsel’s argument have not been fulfilled in the case of assessee and, therefore, at the very threshold it can be concluded that the assessee does not come within the ambit of term ‘banking’. For a co-operative society to come within the ambit of section 80P(4), it is necessary that it should come within the term ‘banking’ as mandated under BRA. On examination of the provisions of section 80P(2)(a)(i), I find that the said section has two limbs (a) cooperative society should be engaged in carrying on the business of banking; and, (b) providing credit facilities to its members. Thus, it is clear that every kind of banking activity, other than the one to be carried on by co-operative bank as defined in Part V of BRA, will come within section 80P(2)(a)(i). Had the intention of legislature been to deny the benefit of all kinds of banking activity, it would not have retained section 80P(2)(a)(i) after introducing section 80P(4).
From the above, it is evident that merely because a co-operative society is carrying on the business of banking, the deduction u/s 80P could not be denied unless it comes within the ambit of cooperative bank as contemplated u/s 80P(4). Therefore, even if, it is held that assessee was carrying on activity of banking still since, it did not answer the description of ‘banking’ as contemplated under the Banking Regulations Act, 1949, it cannot be held to be cooperative bank. Ld. CIT(A) has referred to the provisions of section 56(ccv) of Banking Regulations Act, 1949 for concluding the assessee as ‘primary cooperative bank’. In this regard, it is necessary to examine as to what is the primary object or principal business of assessee. From the forgoing discussion, it is clear that there cannot be any dispute that if the primary object or principal business is banking as contemplated under BRA then only the cooperative society will come within the ambit of primary cooperative bank. Now what is banking has been defined in section 5(b) of the Banking Regulations Act, 1949 and section 56, nowhere states that the context in which primary cooperative bank has been defined is in context different from that as contemplated u/s 5(b) of the Banking Regulations Act, 1949. Therefore, only those transactions of banking business come within the ambit of clause (ccv) of section 56 which meet the mandate of section 5(b) of the Banking Regulations Act, 1949. I find that Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Shri Laxmi Credit Souhard Sahakari Ltd. (supra) has upheld the claim of assessee under identical circumstances and, therefore, respectfully following the decision of Hon’ble Karnataka High Court, the assessee’s claim is allowed.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on this 17th day of February, 2017.