ITO, WD-35(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. SRI LAXMIPAT SURANA, KOLKATA
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the tax effect was below the CBDT's monetary limit for appeals. Following CBDT Circular No. 21/2015, the Tribunal treated the revenue's appeal as withdrawn and dismissed it.
What were the facts?
The revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s deletion of an addition of Rs. 2,13,510/- made on account of accrued interest income. The tax effect involved in the appeal was less than the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT for filing appeals.
What were the issues?
Whether the revenue's appeal was maintainable before the Tribunal given the tax effect was below the CBDT's prescribed monetary limit.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH (D
Before: Shri P.M. Jagtap, AM & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, JM]
order
: April 10, 2018 ORDER
PER P.M. JAGTAP, AM
This appeal is preferred by the revenue against the order of Ld. CIT(Appeals) – 10, Kolkata dated 04.01.2017 and in the solitary ground raised therein, the revenue has challenged the action of the Ld. CIT(A) in deleting the addition of Rs. 2,13,510/- made by the A.O. on account of accrued interest income in violation of Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules.
As submitted by the learned counsel for the assessee at the outset, the tax effect involved in this appeal of the revenue is less than monetary limit of Rs. 10,00,000/- fixed by the CBDT for filing the appeal by the revenue before the Tribunal and this position clearly evident from the ground raised by the revenue in this appeal is not disputed even by the learned DR. In Circular No. 21/2015 (supra)
Assessment Year: 2011-12 Shri Laxmipat Surana issued by the CBDT, the monetary limit for filing the appeals by the revenue before the Tribunal has been increased to Rs. 10,00,000/- and as clarified in the said Circular, the said monetary limit is applicable retrospectively even to the appeals pending before the Tribunal. The CBDT has also instructed that such pending appeals below this specified tax limit of Rs. 10,00,000/- may be withdrawn / not pressed. Keeping in view the instruction given by the CBDT vide Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10.012.2015, which is squarely applicable in the present case, the appeal filed by the revenue in this case is treated as withdrawn / not pressed and dismissed accordingly.
In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 10th April, 2018.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026