Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI D.T. GARASIA, JM & SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
Per Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. The captioned appeal by revenue for Assessment Year [AY] 2009- 10 assails the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)- 24 [CIT(A)], Mumbai, Appeal No. CIT(A)-22/DCIT 10(3)/IT-229/13-14 dated 31/03/2016. The assessment was framed by Ld. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax-10(3), Mumbai [AO] u/s 143(3) read with ITA.No.4216/Mum/2016 Savair Energy Limited Assessment Year-2009-10 Section 147 of the Income Tax Act,1961 on 31/12/2013. The revenue is aggrieved by action of Ld. CIT(A) in restricting the addition on account of certain alleged bogus purchases of Rs.1,65,15,836/- to 11% of such purchases.
The respective representative, at the outset, drew our attention to the fact that the assessee suffered similar addition on account of bogus purchases in AY 2010-11 which was restricted to 10% by Ld. CIT(A). The revenue carried the matter, in similar manner, before this Tribunal vide order dated 18/08/2017 where the stand of Ld. CIT(A) has been confirmed and therefore, similar view may be taken in the matter.
We have perused the cited order of the Tribunal. We find that the assessee suffered similar additions in AY 2010-11 which was restricted to 10% by Ld. CIT(A) and the same has been confirmed by the Tribunal. Therefore, facts and circumstances being the same, taking the same view, we confirm the stand of Ld. CIT(A) and dismiss revenue’s appeal.
Resultantly, the revenue’s appeal stands dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 01st November, 2017.