ACIT, MEERUT vs. M/S. VAM RESORTS & HOTELS (P) LTD., MEERUT
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the revisional order under Section 263, which formed the basis of the addition, was set aside by the Tribunal itself, no addition could be sustained. No evidence was presented to show this decision was altered.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the deletion of an addition of Rs.7,16,62,142/-. This addition was made by the Assessing Officer pursuant to a revised assessment order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
Whether an addition made pursuant to a revisional order that has been subsequently set aside by the Tribunal is valid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH : E : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL, AM & MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JM
(Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Ms Nirupama Kotru, CIT, DR Respondent by: Shri Chander Mehra, CA Date of Hearing : 23.03.2017 Date of Pronouncement: 23.03.2017 ORDER
PER SHRI R.S. SYAL, AM:
This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A) on 29.04.2015 in relation to the Assessment Year 2008-09.
The only issue raised in this appeal by the Revenue is against the deletion of addition of Rs.7,16,62,142/-.
Shorn of unnecessary details, it is observed that the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) was revised by the ld. CIT u/s 263 of the Act. Pursuant to such order, the Assessing Officer passed the instant order making an addition of Rs.7,16,62,142/-. The ld.CIT(A) noticed that the order passed u/s 263 was set aside by the Tribunal and, as such, no addition can be made.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026