Facts
The Assessing Officer made disallowances of Rs.98,21,393/- and Rs.29,30,000/- for stock valuation and share application money. The Assessee appealed to the Ld. Commissioner but failed to respond to notices or file adjournments. Consequently, the Ld. Commissioner dismissed the appeal ex-parte.
Held
The Tribunal found that the Ld. Commissioner dismissed the appeal without deciding on merits due to the Assessee's non-appearance. To ensure substantial justice, the Tribunal decided to give the Assessee another opportunity to present its case.
Key Issues
Whether the Assessee should be granted another opportunity to present its case before the Ld. Commissioner after the appeal was dismissed ex-parte due to non-compliance.
Sections Cited
143(3), 250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “A”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY & SHRI GAGAN GOYAL
Per : Narender Kumar Choudhry, Judicial Member:
This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 27.03.2024, impugned herein, passed by the National Faceless Appeal Center (NFAC)/ Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (in short Ld. Commissioner) under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) for the A.Y. 2013-14.
In the instant case, the Assessing Officer (AO) vide order dated 20.03.2016 u/s 143(3) of the Act made the disallowances of Rs.98,21,393/- & Rs.29,30,000/- on account of stock valuation and share application money pending for allotment respectively. The Assessee, being aggrieved, challenged the aforesaid additions before the Ld. Commissioner, however, in spite of granting opportunities of being heard by way of issuing the notices for hearing, the Assessee neither responded nor filed any adjournment, therefore in the constrained circumstances the Ld. Commissioner dismissed the appeal of the Assessee in limine but not on merits.
We have given thoughtful considerations to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case. As the Ld. Commissioner in the absence of relevant submissions and documents failed to decide the appeal on merits and in its right perspective, therefore for substantial justice and for the just decision of the case, we are inclined to give one more opportunity to the Assessee to substantiate its claim and consequently remanding the instant case to the file of the Ld. Commissioner for decision afresh on merits, suffice to say by affording reasonable opportunity to the assessee to substantiate its claim.
We also direct the assessee to cooperate with the appellate proceedings and to file the relevant submissions/documents which would be essential and required by the Ld. Commissioner for proper adjudication of the case. We clarify that in case of further default the assessee shall not be entitled for any leniency. Hence, the case is remanded accordingly.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 31.07.2024.