M/S. HALO TECHNOLOGIES AND TRAINING PVT LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ACIT-TDS, GHAZIABAD
Facts
The assessee filed a TDS statement for Q1 of AY 2014-15 on 06.08.2014, which was considered by the CPC/AO. A late fee of Rs. 4,400 was levied under section 234E of the Act for the delay. The assessee appealed against this order, but the appeal was dismissed due to a 900-day delay in filing the appeal and the assessee's incorrect response of 'No' to the delay question.
Held
The Tribunal noted that the levy of late fee under Section 234E was applicable only for TDS returns filed after 01.06.2015 as per the amended provisions of Section 200A. Since the TDS statement in question pertains to Q1 (01.01.2014-31.03.2014), which is prior to 01.06.2015, no late fee could be levied.
Key Issues
Whether the late fee levied under section 234E for a TDS statement filed prior to 01.06.2015 is valid.
Sections Cited
234E, 200A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “E”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY & SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY
Per : Narender Kumar Choudhry, Judicial Member:
This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order
dated 10.03.2023, impugned herein, passed by the National Faceless
Appeal Center (NFAC)/ Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (in
short Ld. Commissioner) under section 250 of the Income Tax Act,
1961 (in short ‘the Act’) for the A.Y. 2015-16.
2 ITA No.1772/M/2023 M/s. Halo Technologies and Training Pvt. Ltd.
In this case, the Assessee for the A.Y. 2014-15 has filed its
regular TDS statement pertaining to quarter-1 on 06.08.2014, which
was considered by the CPC/Assessing Officer (AO) vide
intimation/order dated 18.12.2016, whereby the late fee to the tune of
Rs.4,400/- u/s 234E of the Act has been levied for the delay in filing of
the TDS return. The Assessee, being aggrieved, challenged the said
order dated 18.12.2016 before the Ld. Commissioner by filing its
appeal on 05.07.2019 with a delay of 900 days but in column No.14 of
form No.35 replied to the question “whether there is delay in filing
appeal” as “No” and therefore considering the delay in filing of the
appeal, the Ld. Commissioner dismissed the appeal of the Assessee by
not condoning the delay. The Assessee, being aggrieved, is in appeal
before us.
We observe that vide order dated 24.11.2022 for the A.Y. 2014-
15 passed by the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals)/NFAC in Assessee’s own
case, wherein the delay in filing the appeal against the same levy of
late fee u/s 234E of the Act was 1807 days, which was condoned by
the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) on similar facts and circumstances by
observing “that taking an adverse view solely on the reason of prolonged
delay, will deny the Assessee of proper justice based on the merits of the
case. Hence, taking a liberal view in the matter, the Ld. Commissioner
3 ITA No.1772/M/2023 M/s. Halo Technologies and Training Pvt. Ltd.
condoned the delay in filing the appeal and consequently admitted the
same for
adjudication………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………. The delay
in filing the TDS statement was prior to 01.06.2015 and therefore as per
amended provision of section 200A of the Act by which the enabling
provisions in the Act have been introduced for levy of late fee u/s 234E of
the Act and therefore only for the TDS quarterly returns for the periods
after 01.06.2015 the late fee u/s 234E of the Act can be levied.
Admittedly, the period in question which pertains to quarter-1 (i.e.
01.01.2014-31.03.2014) of the F.Y. 2013-14 and the same is prior to
01.06.2015 hence no fee u/s 234E of the Act could be levied while
processing the statement filed u/s 200A of the Act. The levy of late fee of
Rs.7000/- u/s 234E of the Act is deleted”.
Considering the aforesaid decision of the Ld. Commissioner in the
Assessee’s own case for the A.Y. 2014-15 as elaborated above, we are
inclined to delete the amount of Rs.4,400/- levied by the AO u/s 234E
of the Act, as the TDS statement pertains to quarter-1 which was
admittedly filed on 06.08.2014 i.e. prior to 01.06.2015, when
admittedly no enabling provisions for levy of late fee, were in existence
hence the late fee of Rs.4,400/- stands deleted.
4 ITA No.1772/M/2023 M/s. Halo Technologies and Training Pvt. Ltd.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee stands allowed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 31.07.2024.
Sd/- Sd/- (RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY) (NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
* Kishore, Sr. P.S.
Copy to: The Appellant The Respondent The CIT, Concerned, Mumbai The DR Concerned Bench
//True Copy//
By Order
Dy/Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, Mumbai.
