OM GALAXY APARTMENT CHS LTD,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD22(2)(1), MUMBAI, MUBAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
Following the decisions of the Madras High Court and a coordinate bench of this Tribunal, the interest income earned by a co-operative society from deposits with cooperative banks is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a co-operative society, earned interest income of Rs. 4,86,512/- from deposits with cooperative banks. The assessee claimed deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act, but this was rejected by the CPC and confirmed by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Eligibility of a co-operative society to claim deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act on interest income earned from deposits kept with cooperative banks.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- 169 (Guj.), (v) Thorapadi Urban Co-op. Credit Society Ltd. v. ITO54 citing156 Taxmann.com 419 · 2023 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI “J” BENCH : MUMBAI
Before: SHRI B.R. BASKARAN & SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE
Assessment Year 2020-21 Om Galaxy Apartment CHS The Income Tax Officer, Ltd., Ward-22(2)(1), Plot No. 231, Om Galaxy vs. Piramal Chambers, Co-Op. Hsg. Society Ltd., Lal Baug, Sakharam Keer Marg, Mumbai. Matunga West, Mumbai. PAN : AAAJO0045K (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Ms. Rucha Vaidya, For Revenue : Shri Pravin M. Chavan, Sr.DR Date of Hearing : 01-08-2024 Date of Pronouncement : 07-08-2024 ORDER PER B.R. BASKARAN, A.M.
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 31- 03-2024 passed by Ld Addl/JCIT-1, Ludhiana and it relates to the assessment year 2020-21. The only issue urged relates to the eligibility of the assessee to claim deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act in respect of interest income earned on deposits kept with Cooperative banks.
The only issue urged in this appeal relates to the eligibility of the assessee to claim deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act in respect of interest income of Rs.4,86,512/- earned on deposits kept with co- operative bank.
The assessee is a co-operative society and it has earned interest income of Rs.4,86,512/- from deposits kept with co-operative banks. The assessee claimed the same as deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act. The CPC rejected the said claim while processing return of income and the Ld CIT(A) also confirmed the same. Aggrieved, the assessee has filed this appeal.
We notice that an identical issue has been decided by the Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Thorapadi Urban Co-op Credit Society Ltd (2023)(156 taxmann.com 419)(Mad) in favour of the assessee. The relevant observations made by Hon’ble Madras High Court are extracted below:- “8. The main issue is to decide in the present case is as to whether the petitioner Co-operative Society is entitled for a deduction for the interest income received from the Co-operative Bank? 9. It would be appropriate to extract hereunder the relevant portion of Section80P(2)(d).
“80 P. Deduction in respect of income of cooperative societies: (1) ……… ………. ……… (2) The sums referred to in sub-section (1) shall be the following, namely :— (a) to (c) ……. ……. …… (d) “in respect of any income by way of interest or dividends derived by the co-operative society from its investment with any other co-operative society, the whole of such income” 9.1 A reading of the above said provision makes it clear that in the event if any Co-operative Society derived income by way of interest from investment made in any other Co-operative Society the whole such interest is eligible for deduction. Now the issue is as to whether the Co- operative Bank would fall within the purview of the term „Co-operative
Society‟. In the present case, the petitioner produced a document to show that the Co-operative Bank, where they have made investments was registered under the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 on 20.5.2003. In this regard, he also produced a copy of the Certificate of Incorporation of the said Co-operative Bank. Therefore, it is clear that the investment made by the petitioner is a Co-operative Bank registered under the Co-operative Societies Act. The Income Tax Act, 1961 has also defined „Co-operative Society‟ under Section 2(19) as follows:
“2(19). “Co-operative society” means a co-operative society registered under the Co- operative Societies Act, 1912 (2 of 1912 ), or under any other law for the time being in force in any State for the registration of co- operative societies.”
A reading of the above definition would make it clear that „Co- operative Society‟ means a Co-operative Society registered under Co- operative Societies Act, 1912. Thus, a Co-operative Society referred therein is only a co-operative society as defined under the Act, be it a Co-operative Society carrying on banking business or Co- operative Society carrying on the other businesses or a Co- operative bank.” 5. Following the above said decision of Hon’ble Madras High Court, this bench of Tribunal has held in the case of Backbay Premises Co-op Society Ltd (ITA Nos. 4144 & 4146/Mum/2023 dated 14.06.2024) has held that the interest income earned by a co-operative society from co- operative banks are eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act. 6. In view of the above discussions, we are of the view that the tax authorities are not justified in denying deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act in respect of interest income earned by the assessee from deposits kept co-operative banks. Accordingly, we set aside the order passed by Ld CIT(A) on this issue and direct the AO to allow deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) to the assessee on the interest income earned from deposits kept with co-operative banks. 7. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 7th August, 2024.
More judgments on Section 80P(2)(d)
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- S R P Jutha 13 Rajkot VI and Gr S Ma, Rajkot vs ITO WD 1(2)(1) Rajkot, RajkotITA 951/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Poonam Chambers B Wing Commercial Premises… vs Deputy Commissioner Income Tax, MumbaiITA 7044/MUM/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- Poonam Chambers B Wing Commercial Premises… vs Deputy Commissioner Income Tax, MumbaiITA 7043/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Suvarnakarara Co-Operative Society Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 2, KarwarITA 210/PAN/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026