Loading judgment…
Facts
The assessees, LN Memorial Charitable Trust and Oshi Foundation, filed appeals against the order of the CIT (Exemption) Jaipur, which rejected their applications for registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act. The primary reason for rejection was the alleged non-registration under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959.
Held
The Tribunal held that the CIT (Exemption) acted in a hurried and irrational manner. The Rajasthan Public Trust Act registration was pending at the time of rejection and was granted shortly after. The issue of genuineness of activities was deemed premature as the trust had not yet commenced activities.
Key Issues
Whether the rejection of registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act solely based on pending registration under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959, is justified.
Sections Cited
12AB, 12A(1)(ac)(iii)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH (Virtual
Before: DR. MITHA LAL MEENA, HONBLE & DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, HONBLE
These two appeals by the assessees are directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur (hereinafter referred to "the CIT Exemption"] even dated 29.03.2024, challenging therein rejection of their applications filed in Form 10AB for registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act (In short 'the act').
After hearing both the sides and perusal of record, we find that the Ld. CIT exemption has rejected the applications filed by the assessee u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) in Form No. 10AB seeking registration u/s 12AB of IT Act, 1961 primarily on the ground that the assessee was not registered under Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959 (In short 'RPT Act'). The Ld. AR requested that the issue be set aside to Ld. CIT (E) with a direction to grant registration as the registration has already been granted under Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959. Accordingly, on similar facts, this issue is heard as covered matter by the decision of the coordinate Bench in the case of "Shri Jay Durga Brahmani Gaushala Samiti Vs. CIT (Exemption) in ITA No. 403/Jodh/2024 on the issue of RPT registration. The relevant part of the decision reads as under:
After hearing both the sides and perusal of record, we find that the Ld. CIT exemption has rejecte') application filed by the assessee u/s 12A(I)(ac)(iii) in Form No. 10AB seeking registration u/s 12AB of IT Act, 1961 on the ground that Firstly the assessee was not registered under Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959 (In short 'RPT Act') and secondly the assessee has failed to prove the genuineness of its activities. It is seen that the assessee application was pending for registration under Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959 and that the assessee was registered on 20.03.2024 under Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959 (In short 'RPT Act') just 2 days to rejection of its application for registration by the learned CIT exemption vide order dated 18/03/2024. 3. Therefore, The Ld. AR requested that the issue be set aside to Ld. CIT (E) with a direction to grant registration as the registration has already been granted under Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959 as above. The AR submitted that the issue of registration u/s 12AB may be restored to the file the CIT Exemption with direction to examine the matter afresh as per amended law after affording adequate opportunity of being heard. The AR undertakes to make compliance to all the quarries of the CIT exemption in the fresh proceedings.
Accordingly, we hold that the Ld. CIT Exemption has acted in hurry and irrational manner while rejecting the appellants application for registration u/s 12AB of the act, merely on account of registration under RPT Act though it was pending before the competent authority and granted in 2 days of the impugned order. Another issue questioned by the Ld. CIT Exemption regarding genuineness of activities of the Trust is not relevant at this stage because the assessee Trust is yet to commence its activities on receipt of registration u/s 12AB of the Act.
Considering the peculiar facts of the instant case, we are of the considered view that the assessee has good and arguable case for granting registration u/s 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. In view of principles of natural justice, we consider it deem fit to remand back the matter regarding grant of registration under section 12 AB of the Income Tax Act to the file of the Ld. CIT exemption for afresh adjudication after granting adequate opportunity of being heard and considering the written submissions filed on the record and to be filed during fresh proceedings. Appellant and its council are also directed to cooperate in the fresh proceedings by filing the requisite details in compliance to the queries raised by the learned CIT exemption for the purpose of adjudication of the matter of grant of registration act section 12AB of the Act, in accordance with law. Further, the Id. CIT (DR) has no objection to the request of the assesee in granting an opportunity since he has been granted registration under RPT.
From the material on record, it is evident that the assessee has good arguable case for granting registration u/s 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 provided adequate opportunity to establish genuineness of its activities. In view of principles of natural justice, we consider it deem fit to remand back the matter regarding grant of registration under section 12 AB of the Income Tax Act to the file of the Ld. CIT exemption for afresh adjudication after granting adequate opportunity of being heard and considering the written submissions filed on the record and to be filed during fresh proceedings. Appellant and its council are also directed to cooperate in the fresh proceedings by filing the requisite details in compliance to the queries raised by the learned CIT exemption for the purpose of adjudication of the matter of grant of registration act section 12AB of the Act, in accordance with law.
Accordingly, the matter in both the captioned appeals is restored to the file of the Ld. CIT Exemption to examine the application of the assessee Trust de novo for the purpose of Registration u/s 12AB of the Act as per the mandate.
In the result, the appeals in ITA Nos. ITA No. 473 and 474/Jodh/2024 are allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on.24/06/2025 in open court. (DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI) JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 29/06/2025 (DR. MITHA/LAL MEENA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Copies to : (1) The appellant. (2) The respondent. (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File By Oder