HARI SINGH,RAISEN vs. ITO RAISEN, RAISEN
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that both the assessment order and the CIT(A)'s order were ex-parte. Considering the assessee's medical condition and the Revenue's no-objection, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the AO for a de novo assessment.
What were the facts?
The assessee did not file an income tax return. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an ex-parte assessment of Rs. 12,00,000 based on cash deposits in the assessee's bank account. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal ex-parte due to non-compliance.
What were the issues?
Whether the ex-parte assessment and appellate orders were valid given the assessee's medical condition and lack of opportunity to be heard. The validity of ex-parte orders passed without considering the assessee's submissions due to incapacitation.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Per Paresh M Joshi, J.M.:
This is an Appeal filed by the Assessee under section 253 of the income tax Act 1961,[ herein after referred to as the Act
for the sake of brevity] before this tribunal as & by way of a second Appeal. The Assessee is aggrieved by the order
bearing Number:-ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1072367517 (1)
dated 21.01.2025 passed by the Ld. CIT(A) u/s 250 of the Act, which is herein after referred to as the “Impugned
order”. The Relevant Assessment year is 2012-13 and the Hari Singh ITA No. 536/Ind/2025 - A.Y.2012-13
corresponding previous year period is from 01.04.2011 to 31.03.2012. 2. Factual Matrix
1 That as and by way of an Assessment order made u/s 144 of the Act, the total income of
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026