SH. ARPIT GOEL,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's application for withdrawal and confirmed that the Departmental Representative had no objection to the withdrawal. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal as withdrawn, subject to all just exceptions.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for Assessment Year 2019-20 against a CIT(A) order which arose from proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. During the hearing, the assessee submitted an application requesting to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal should be allowed, leading to its dismissal by the Tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’, NEW DELHI
Before: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara
Asstt. Year : 2019-20 Sh. Arpit Goel, Vs DCIT, N-14, South Delhi, Central Central-19, Kailash Colony, New Delhi-110055 New Delhi-110048 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. ANPPG3192D Assessee by: Ms. Shilpa Gupta, CA Revenue by : Sh. Amit Shukla, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 23.12.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 23.12.2025 ORDER
This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2019-20, arises against the CIT(A)-27, New Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/APL/M/250/2025-26/1082201863(1) dated 30.10.2025, in proceedings u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”).
Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused.
It emerges at the outset that the assessee has filed his application for withdrawal of the instant appeal as under:
“Sir, Sub: Request for withdrawal of appeal in the case of Sh. Arpit Goel for AY 2019-20 in The above said appeal is fixed for hearing before Your Honours for today i.e. 23.12.2025 Arpit Goel As per the instructions, the assessee wants to withdraw the aforesaid captioned appeal and it is humbly prayed that the same may please be allowed.” 4. Learned departmental representative submits that he has no objection to the instant withdrawal application per se. Ordered accordingly.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026