SHRI DANDI SEWA ASHRAM,ONKARESHWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER EXEMPTION , BHOPAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, finding the cause presented to be reasonable and not deliberately negligent. However, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, stating that the power to condone the delay in filing Form 10B rests with the Commissioner of Income-tax and not the appellate authorities.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust registered under section 12A/12AA, filed its return for AY 2017-18 belatedly without the mandatory Form 10B. The CPC processed the return, disallowed exemptions, and created a demand. The CIT(A) upheld the Assessing Officer's order, stating that the power to condone the delay in filing Form 10B lies with the Commissioner, not the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned, and whether the CIT(A) erred in not granting exemption due to the non-filing of Form 10B.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Association of Indian Panelboard Manufacturer v. DCIT21 citing143 Taxmann.com 418 · 2022 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI B.M. BIYANI & SHRI PARESH M JOSHI
Per Paresh M Joshi, J.M.: This is an Appeal filed by the Assessee under section 253 of the income tax Act 1961,[ herein after referred to as the Act for the sake of convenience & brevity] before this tribunal as and by way of a second appeal. The Assessee is aggrieved by the order bearing Number:-ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- 25/1065627607(1) dated 13/06/2024 passed by the Ld. CIT (A) u/s 250 of the Act, which is herein after referred to as the "Impugned order”. The Relevant Assessment year is 2017- 18 and the corresponding previous year period is from 01.04.2016 to 31.03.2017. 2. Factual Matrix
1 That as and by way of an order made u/s 154 bearin
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026