BABAN DASHRATH HANDE,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT CEN CIR-36, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the last order was passed over 9 years ago and no progress has been made in prosecuting the appeals. In the absence of legal heirs and their representation, the appeals cannot be further prosecuted.
What were the facts?
The appeals were filed by Baban Dashrath Hande for Assessment Year 2002-03 and Block Period 01.04.1996 to 26.02.2003. The sole appellant has passed away, and no steps have been taken to bring the legal heirs on record. No one appeared on behalf of the appellant or the department.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals can be prosecuted further when the sole appellant has passed away and legal heirs have not been brought on record.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “B”, MUMBAI
Before: JUSTICE (RETD.) C.V. BHADANG & SHRI B.R. BASKARAN
PER JUSTICE (RETD.) C.V. BHADANG, PRESIDENT :
Both these appeals are by the same appellant-assessee and they pertain to Asst. Year 2002-03 and block period 01.04.1996 to 26.02.2003. It appears that the sole appellant is dead and, therefore, the Bench had passed the following order as far back as on 12.03.2015 :
“12.03.15 Hearing is adjourned to sine die. Let the legal heir are brought on record after obtaining no objection from department. Only after bringing legal heirs on record post the appeal a/w ITA 91/M/08.”
Till today no steps have been taken to bring the legal heirs on record and to prosecute the appeals further. The appeals are of the year 2008 and the last order as noticed above has been passed more than 9 years before. Today there is no appearance on behalf of any legal heirs of the appellant- assessee. None appears for the Department. In such circumstances, both the appeals are disposed off as abated.
Order pronounced in the open court on 26.08.2024.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026