DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. SH. SHIV PRIYA, NOIDA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the departmental appeal was not maintainable due to the low tax effect, as per Board Circular No. 21/15. The assessee's cross objection was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed the deletion of an addition of Rs. 33,30,000/- made on account of deemed dividend. The tax effect in the departmental appeal was below Rs. 10,00,000/-.
What were the issues?
Maintainability of departmental appeal due to low tax effect and withdrawal of assessee's cross objection.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES, “G” New Delhi
Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI & SHRI. A N MISHRA
PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M. : The departmental appeal as well as the cross objection by the assessee are directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-I, New Delhi dated 18th June, 2014 for AY 2007-08.
In the departmental appeal, Revenue challenged the deletion of addition of Rs. 33,30,000/- on account of deemed dividend u/s 2(22) (e) of the Income Tax Act.
Admittedly, the tax effect in the departmental appeal is below Rs. 10,00,000/-. According to the Board Circular No. 21/15 dated 10th December, 2015, the appeal of the department would not be maintainable before the tribunal in case the tax effect in the departmental appeal would not exceed Rs. 10,00,000/-. In view of the above circular, learned DR submitted that he would not be pressing the departmental appeal. The departmental appeal would not fall in exceptions provided in the above circular. The circular applies to pending dept. appeals as well. 4. In view of the above, the departmental appeal is not maintainable and dismissed as is filed against the board circular. 5. Learned counsel for the also seeks permission to withdraw the cross objection. He has made endorsement to that effect in the cross objection itself. Cross objection of the assessee is therefore dismissed as withdrawn. 6. In the result, the departmental appeal as well as cross objection are dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on the 29th day of March, 2017.
More judgments on Section 2(22)(e)
- Sindhu Farms Pvt Ltd, Gurugram vs DCIT, RohtakITA 8194/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Pranav Prakashchandra Kansara, Ahmedabad vs ITO Ward 5 3 2 Ahmedabad, Aayakar Bhavan…ITA 911/AHD/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Pranav Prakashchandra Kansara, Ahmedabad vs ITO Ward 5 3 2 Ahmedabad, Aayakar Bhavan…ITA 911/AHD/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- M/S. Jsw Infrastructure Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6051/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- M/S. Jsw Cement Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4867/MUM/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026