DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. SH. SHIV PRIYA, NOIDA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 4837/DEL/2014Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 March 2017AY 2007-084 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the departmental appeal was not maintainable due to the low tax effect, as per Board Circular No. 21/15. The assessee's cross objection was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The Revenue appealed the deletion of an addition of Rs. 33,30,000/- made on account of deemed dividend. The tax effect in the departmental appeal was below Rs. 10,00,000/-.

What were the issues?

Maintainability of departmental appeal due to low tax effect and withdrawal of assessee's cross objection.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 2(22)(e)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES, “G” New Delhi

Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI & SHRI. A N MISHRA

Hearing: 31.03.2017

PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M. : The departmental appeal as well as the cross objection by the assessee are directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-I, New Delhi dated 18th June, 2014 for AY 2007-08.

2.

In the departmental appeal, Revenue challenged the deletion of addition of Rs. 33,30,000/- on account of deemed dividend u/s 2(22) (e) of the Income Tax Act.

3.

Admittedly, the tax effect in the departmental appeal is below Rs. 10,00,000/-. According to the Board Circular No. 21/15 dated 10th December, 2015, the appeal of the department would not be maintainable before the tribunal in case the tax effect in the departmental appeal would not exceed Rs. 10,00,000/-. In view of the above circular, learned DR submitted that he would not be pressing the departmental appeal. The departmental appeal would not fall in exceptions provided in the above circular. The circular applies to pending dept. appeals as well. 4. In view of the above, the departmental appeal is not maintainable and dismissed as is filed against the board circular. 5. Learned counsel for the also seeks permission to withdraw the cross objection. He has made endorsement to that effect in the cross objection itself. Cross objection of the assessee is therefore dismissed as withdrawn. 6. In the result, the departmental appeal as well as cross objection are dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on the 29th day of March, 2017.

More judgments on Section 2(22)(e)

All 1,757 judgments and leading authorities on Section 2(22)(e) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →