Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI G.S.PANNU, AM & SHRI RAVISH SOOD, JM
आदेश / O R D E R
PER RAVISH SOOD, JUDICIAL MEMBER
The captioned appeal filed by the revenue pertaining to assessment year 2011-12 is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-41, Mumbai, dated 25.02.2017, which in itself arises from the P a g e | DCIT Vs. Shri Vineet S. Agrawal order passed by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’), dated 19.02.2014.
That at the very outset of the hearing of the appeal it was submitted by the ld. Departmental Representative (for short ‘D.R.’) that ‘tax effect’ involved in this appeal was less than Rs.10.00 lacs.
The CBDT vide its Circular No. 21.2015, dated 10.12.2015 has revised the monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department before the Tribunal, retrospectively. Since the tax effect in dispute in the captioned appeal is stated to be below the monetary limit of Rs.10.00 lac specified in the CBDT Circular, dated 10.12.2015 (supra), therefore, the same is dismissed as not maintainable.