ABU JANI SANDEEP KHOSLA,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CEN CIR 22, MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The Revenue's representative had no objection to this plea.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2002-03. The assessee's representative requested to withdraw the appeal, stating that two appeals for the same assessment year were inadvertently filed.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can withdraw an appeal due to inadvertent filing of multiple appeals for the same assessment year.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “A”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI PAWAN SINGH
The captioned appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of CIT(A)-39, Mumbai dated 30.11.2012 pertaining to the Assessment Year 2002-03, which in turn has arisen from the order passed by the Assessing Officer dated 21.12.2010 under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’).
The learned representative for the assessee has filed a letter dated 28.11.2017 requesting permission to withdraw the appeal, which reads as under :- “With reference to the above and instruction from our above-mentioned client, we have to submit the following for your kind consideration. The appeal was fixed for today i.e. 28.11.2017 The same has been refixed for 29.11.2017 We have to submit that inadvertently 2 (two) appeals for the same assessment year were filed. Appeal No. 704/Mum/13 Appeal No. 3296/Mum/13 The appeal No. 3296/Mum/13 was heard by the Hon'ble “A” Bench on 22nd November 2017 and has been restored back to the ld. CIT(A) by pronouncement in open court. Order awaited.
As the issue is same in both the matter may we request your Honor to kindly allow us to withdraw the appeal no. 704/Mum/13.”
The ld. CIT-DR appearing for the Revenue has no objection to the aforesaid plea of assessee.
Accordingly, the appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
The above decision was pronounced in the open court in the presence of both the parties at the conclusion of hearing on 29th November, 2017.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026