Facts
Shree Balaji Medical Trust applied for registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act using Form 10AB. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) rejected the application ex-parte, citing incomplete documentation, non-compliance with notices requesting additional documents, and the statutory time limit. The appellant challenged this rejection, arguing they were not given an opportunity to be heard and the application was not considered on merits.
Held
The Tribunal directed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) to provide the appellant with an adequate opportunity of being heard. The CIT (Exemptions) is to consider all necessary documents filed by the appellant and then decide the application for registration under Section 12AB read with Section 12A of the Income Tax Act on its merits.
Key Issues
Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) was justified in rejecting an application for registration under Section 12AB without granting an opportunity of being heard and without considering the application on merits.
Sections Cited
Section 12AB, Section 12A, Section 250, Rule 17A(2)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “B”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY
O R D E R Per: Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Accountant Member: 1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant against the Order of the Ld. CIT (Appeals) passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act [the ‘Act’ in short] Shree Balaji Medical Trust; A. Y.2024-25 vide DIN & Order No. ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2024-25/1064219812(1) Dated 19/04/2024 for the Assessment Year 2024-25.
Following grounds of appeal have been raised by the appellant: “This appeal is against the order dated 19th April, 2024 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Mumbai rejecting the Appellant application for registration under section 12AB r.w.s 12A of the Income-tax Act 1) The Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions) erred in passing an ex-parte order rejecting the Appellant application for registration u/s. 12AB r.w.s 12A of the Income-tax Act 2) The Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions) failed to appreciate that the provisional registration granted to the Appellant under section 12AB r.w.s 12A was valid till AY 2025- 26 and therefore erred in rejecting the Appellants application for registration. 3) The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) erred in not considering the facts placed on record and the documents filed by the Appellant alongwith its application for registration filed in Form 10AB. 4) The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) erred in not granting an opportunity of being heard to the Appellant before rejecting the application for registration u/s. 12AB r.w.s 12A. 5) The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) erred in not passing an order under section 12AB r.w.s 12A on merits. 6) The Appellant submits that the Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions) be directed to grant an opportunity of being heard to the Appellant and thereafter decide the Appellant's application for registration under section 12AB r.w.s 12A on merits. The Appellant craves leave to add to, amend, alter, modify or withdraw any or all the Grounds of Appeal Shree Balaji Medical Trust; A. Y.2024-25 before or at the time of hearing of the Appeal, as they may be advised from time to time.”
The facts of the case, in brief, are that Shri Balaji Medical Trust filed an application in form no. 10AB seeking registration u/s. 12AB of the Act. The necessary documents as required in form 10A or 10AB were provided to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) for granting of registration u/s. 12AB of the Act. The Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) rejected the application for the grant of registration u/s. 12AB on the ground that “On verification of the application in Form 10AB filed by the assessee, it was found that the application was not complete, and all the documents required to be accompanying the application were not furnished. Hence, a notice was issued to the applicant vide DIN & Notice No. ITBA/EXM/F/EXM43/2024- 25/1062995438(1) dated 20.03.2024 requesting the assessee to furnish the complete set of documents mentioned in Rule 17A(2). A reminder notice was also issued vide DIN & Notice No. ITBA/EXM/F/EXM43/2024-25/1064067692(1) dated 12.04.2024. The Applicant has made no compliance to the terms of the above notices. Registration under section 12AB is to be granted in terms of the provisions of section 12AB(1)(b) of the Act after being satisfied about the objects of the trust or institution, the genuineness of activities, and the Shree Balaji Medical Trust; A. Y.2024-25 compliance of any other law for the time being in force as are material for the purposes of achieving its objects. In the absence of necessary compliance by the Applicant, I am unable to arrive at a satisfaction on these parameters. As such, in view of the statutory limitation to decide on the application on or before 30.04.2024, I am left with no other option but to reject the application seeking registration under section 12AB of the Act.”
Aggrieved against the rejection of the registration u/s. 12AB of the Income Tax Act, this appeal to the appellant u/s. 12AB r.w.s. 12A of the Income Tax Act was valid till assessment year 2025-26. The appellant finally prayed that the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) may be directed to grant an opportunity of being heard to the appellant and thereafter decided the granting of registration after considering the appellant’s application along with documents filed with the application and also provided adequate opportunity of being heard to the appellant before granting of registration u/s. 12AB r.w.s.12A of the Income Tax Act on merit.
We have considered the above submission and accordingly direct the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Mumbai to provide adequate opportunity of being heard to the appellant and consider all the Shree Balaji Medical Trust; A. Y.2024-25 necessary documents filed by the appellant and decide the granting of registration u/s. 12AB r.w.s. 12A of the Income Tax Act.
In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purpose. Order pronounced in the open court on 28.08.2024.