DCIT, CIRCLE - 3(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. GUWAHATI CARBON LIMITED, KOLKATA
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the tax effect of the appeal was below the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT for filing appeals. Following CBDT Circular No. 21/2015, the Tribunal treated the appeal as withdrawn and dismissed it.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(Appeals) which deleted an addition made by the AO. The addition was related to the computation of book profit under section 115JA by restricting the deduction under section 80IA.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue is maintainable given the tax effect is below the prescribed monetary limit as per CBDT circulars.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH (SMC
Before: Shri P.M. Jagtap, AM]
order
: May 16, 2018 ORDER
PER P.M. JAGTAP, AM
This appeal is preferred by the revenue against the order of Ld. CIT(Appeals) – 8, Kolkata dated 21.11.2017 whereby he deleted the addition of Rs. 47,87,772/- made by the A.O. by way of rectification order under section 154 while computing the book profit of the assessee under section 115JA by restricting its claim for deduction under section 80IA to that extent.
As pointed out by the learned counsel for the assessee at the outset, the tax effect involved in this appeal of the revenue is less than monetary limit of Rs. 10,00,000/- fixed by the CBDT for filing the appeal by the revenue before the Tribunal and this position clearly evident from the order passed by the A.O. under section 154 is not Assessment Year: 2000-01 M/s. Guwahati Carbon Ltd. disputed even by the learned DR. In Circular No. 21/2015 (supra) issued by the CBDT, the monetary limit for filing the appeals by the revenue before the Tribunal has been increased to Rs. 10,00,000/- and as clarified in the said Circular, the said monetary limit is applicable retrospectively even to the appeals pending before the Tribunal. The CBDT has also instructed that such pending appeals below this specified tax limit of Rs. 10,00,000/- may be withdrawn / not pressed. Keeping in view the instruction given by the CBDT vide Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10.012.2015, which is squarely applicable in the present case, the appeal filed by the revenue in this case is treated as withdrawn / not pressed and dismissed accordingly.
In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 16th May, 2018.
More judgments on Section 115JA
- DCIT., Circle-1(1), Hyderabad vs M/S. Aragen Life Sciences Limited, HyderabadITA 639/HYD/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed25 Jul 2025AY 2015-16
- Gujarat State Electricity Corporation Ltd… vs The Dy.CIT., Circle-1(1), BarodaITA 1246/AHD/2012[2003-04]Status: Disposed19 Jun 2025AY 2003-04
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1), Hyderabad vs Regency Ceramics Limited, HyderabadITA 1350/HYD/2024[1998-99]Status: Disposed2 Jun 2025AY 1998-99
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1), Hyderabad vs Regency Ceramics Limited, HyderabadITA 1340/HYD/2024[2002-2003]Status: Disposed2 Jun 2025AY 2002-2003
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-3 (1), Hyderabad vs Regency Ceramics Limited, HyderabadITA 1339/HYD/2024[2001-2002]Status: Disposed2 Jun 2025AY 2001-2002
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026