DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX -23(1), MUMBAI vs. LAXMI FINANCE AND LEASING COMPANY CO-OP. SOCIETY LTD, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal regarding transfer fees, upholding the CIT(A)'s decision that such fees are exempt based on the principle of mutuality and Supreme Court precedents. For the ALV on vacant properties, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s directive to compute ALV based on municipal rateable value, rejecting the Revenue's argument for fair rental value and confirming that Section 23(1)(c) does not apply where property was not let out at all. Both the Revenue's appeals and the assessee's cross-objections were dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a co-operative society, filed returns declaring income from house property (renting surplus office premises) and interest. The case primarily involved two disputes: the computation of Annual Letting Value (ALV) for let-out and vacant properties, where the AO adopted a higher ALV based on fair rent while the CIT(A) directed municipal rateable value for vacant properties; and the taxability of transfer fees received, which the AO added to income but the CIT(A) deleted based on the principle of mutuality.
What were the issues?
1. Proper determination of Annual Letting Value (ALV) for let-out and vacant properties under Section 23 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Taxability of transfer fees received by a co-operative society under the principle of mutuality.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 23(1)(a),Section 23(1)(b),Section 23(1)(c),Section 23(2)(a),Section 23(2)(b),Section 23(3)(a),Section 23(3)(c)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- 216 ITR 3215 citing216 ITR 321 · 1995 · HC
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
आदेश / O R DER PER BENCH: The aforesaid appeals have been filed by the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessee against order dated 27/09/2023 passed by the learned CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi for A.Y.2014-15 & 2015-16. M/s. Laxmi Finance and Leasing Company Co-operative Society Ltd.,
The appeal for the A.Y.2014-15 was taken as the lead case and the decision rendered thereon shall apply with equal force for A.Y.2015-16 also except with variance
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 23(1)(a)
- DCIT CC 5.4, Mumbai vs Wadhwagroup Holdings Private Limited, MumbaiITA 3412/MUM/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- DCIT CC 5.4, Mumbai vs Wadhwagroup Holdings Private Limited, MumbaiITA 3411/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- DCIT CC 5.4, Mumbai vs Wadhwagroup Holdings Private Limited, MumbaiITA 3410/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Shakir Hussain Qureshi, Mumbai vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4187/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed23 Jul 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer Ward 5 3 1 Mumbai, Mumbai vs Sai Palace Hotels Pvt.Ltd, MumbaiITA 472/MUM/2026[2011-12]Status: Disposed15 Jul 2026AY 2011-12
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026