DEEPAK VEGPRO (P) LTD ,ALWAR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALWAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal observed that the assessee failed to produce evidence such as lease agreements or revenue records to substantiate its claim that the land was used for agricultural purposes. Despite repeated opportunities, the necessary documents were not furnished.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) which dismissed its appeal challenging an assessment order. The addition of Rs. 98,460/- was made on account of disallowance of agricultural income claimed by the assessee, who stated the land was utilized for agricultural activities and leased out.
What were the issues?
Whether the agricultural income claimed by the assessee is allowable without substantiating documentary evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B-Bench” JAIPUR
In view of the above discussion, this appeal is disposed for statistical purposes, and the matter is remitted to the Assessing Officer for decision afresh to afford another opportunity of being heard to the assessee, and the Assessing Officer shall decide the matter afresh, while taking into consideration the entire relevant material relating to the issues involved. File be consigned to the record room after the needful is done by the office. Order to be pronounced under Rule 34(4) of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 by placing the details on the notice board. Sd/- Sd/-
¼vUuiw.kkZ xqIrk½ ¼ujsUnz dqekj½ (ANNAPURNA GUPTA ) (NARINDER KUMAR) ys[kk lnL; @Accountant Member U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 05/01/2026 *Santosh आदेश की प्रतिलिपिअग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू
More judgments on Section 2(1A)
- Prafulldan Motising Gadhvi, Ahmedabad vs ITO Ward 4(2)(1) Ahmedabad, Pratyaksha Kar…ITA 2589/AHD/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Regis Industries Limited, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 3(1), KolkataITA 248/KOL/2026[2018-2019]Status: Heard1 Sept 2026AY 2018-2019
- Samirbhai Dilipbhai Upadhyay L/H of Late… vs ITO, Ward-2, VapiITA 1063/SRT/2025[2011-12]Status: Disposed24 Jul 2026AY 2011-12
- Baktiar Ali Khan, Purba Medinipur vs ITO, Ward 27(1), HaldiaITA 210/KOL/2026[2020-2021]Status: Disposed2 Jul 2026AY 2020-2021
- Plants Planet, Navi Mumbai vs Income Tax Officer, Navi MumbaiITA 2471/MUM/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed17 Jun 2026AY 2017-2018
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026