SHRIMAD DAYANAND SHIKSHA SAMITI,BHILWARA vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR

PDF
ITA 1002/JPR/2024Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur05 January 2026AY 2019-20Bench: SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA (Accountant Member), SHRI NARINDER KUMAR (Judicial Member)1 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

The appellant society's applications for registration under Section 12AB and approval under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act were rejected by the learned CIT(E). This was the second round of litigation, with previous appeals being restored by the ITAT for fresh examination. The CIT(E) rejected the applications again citing non-genuineness of activities and non-registration under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act.

Held

The Tribunal noted that the appellant society failed to provide the requisite details and clarifications despite multiple opportunities. The CIT(E) was justified in concluding that the genuineness of the activities could not be ascertained. However, considering the peculiar facts, the Tribunal allowed the restoration of the matters to the CIT(E) for a fresh decision.

Key Issues

Whether the CIT(E) rightly rejected the applications for registration and approval due to non-compliance by the applicant society, and if restoration of the matter is warranted.

Sections Cited

12AB, 80G, 12AA, 153(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A-Bench” JAIPUR

Before: SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA, AM & SHRI NARINDER KUMAR, JM vk;dj vihyla-@ITA No. 1002 & 1003/JPR/2024 Shrimad Dayanand Shiksha Samiti cuke Shri Devang Gargieya, Adv.

Hearing: 24/12/2025Pronounced: 05/01/2026

Result

20.

In view of the above discussion, reasons and findings, both these appeals are disposed for statistical purpose and both the applications i.e. one u/s 12AA and the other application u/s 80G of the Act are restored to the files of Learned CIT(E) for decision afresh, after providing another opportunity to the applicant society, of being heard, including opportunity to produce all the relevant documents. Files be consigned to the record room after the needful is done by the office. Copy of this common order be placed on the connected file. Order to be pronounced under Rule 34(4) of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 by placing the details on the notice board. Sd/- Sd/- ¼vUuiw.kkZ xqIrk½ ¼ujsUnz dqekj½ (ANNAPURNA GUPTA ) (NARINDER KUMAR) ys[kk lnL; @Accountant Member U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member fnukad@Dated:- 05/01/2026

13 ITA No. 1002& 1003/JPR/2024 Shrimad Dayanad Shiksha Samiti, Bhilwara. *Santosh आदेश की प्रतिलिपिअग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू The Appellant- Shrimad Dayanand Shiksha Samiti, Bhilwara. 1. 2. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- CIT(E), Jaipur. 3. vk;djvk;qDr@ Theld CIT vk;djvk;qDr@CIT(A) 4. 5. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकरअपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत 6. xkMZQkbZy@ Guard File ITA No. 1002 & 1003/JPR/2024) vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order, सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेजज. त्महपेजतंत

SHRIMAD DAYANAND SHIKSHA SAMITI,BHILWARA vs CIT(E), JAIPUR | BharatTax