INCOME TAX OFFICER, BANGALORE vs. M/S.VASAVI CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee is a credit co-operative society eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) and not a bank, making Section 80P(4) inapplicable. The CIT(A)'s order was upheld.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a credit co-operative society, claimed exemption under Section 80P(2)(a)(i). The Assessing Officer denied this exemption, considering the society a bank and thus ineligible under Section 80P(4). The CIT(A) allowed the assessee's appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether a credit co-operative society can be treated as a bank for the purpose of denying deduction under Section 80P(4) of the Income-tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCH ‘A’
Before: SHRI VIJAYPAL RAO & SHRI JASON P BOAZ
PER SHRI JASON P BOAZ, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) -2, Bangalore dated 15/6/2016 for the Assessment Year 2012-13.
Briefly stated, the facts of the case are as under:-
2.1 The assessee, a credit co-operative society, filed its return of income for asst. year 2012-13 declaring income of Rs.3,23,495/-. The return was processed u/s 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) and the case was subsequently taken up for scrutiny. The assessment was completed u/s 143(3) of the Act vide order dated 30/5/2015; wherein the income of the assessee was determined at Rs.92,94,440/-. This was in view of the Assessing Officer (‘AO’) denying the assessee claim for exemption u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) amounting to Rs.89,15,937/- as he was of the opinion that the assessee credit co- operative society is in fact a bank as per section 5(ccv) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and, therefore, as per the provision of sec. 80P(4) of the Act, the deduction claimed u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act was not allowable. On appeal, the ld CIT(A) vide the impugned order dated 15/6/2016 allowed the assessee’s appeal for grant of deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act following the decisions of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Yashwanthpur Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. (ITA No.237/2012 dated 27/6/2014) and the case of Sri Biluru Gurubasava Pattina Sahakari Sangha Niyamitha, Bagalkot in dated 5/2/2014.
3.1 Revenue, being aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A)-2, Bangalore dated 15/6/2016, has preferred this appeal raising the following grounds:-
3.2.1 We have heard the rival contentions of the ld DR for Revenue and the ld AR for the assessee, and perused and carefully considered the material on record, including the judicial pronouncements cited.
We find that the ld CIT(A), in the impugned order, following the decisions of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the cases of Yashwanthpur Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. (ITA No.237/2012 dated 27/6/2014) and the case of Sri Biluru Gurubasav Pattina Sahakari Sangha Niyamitha, Bagalkot in dated 5/2/2014 allowed the assessee’s appeal holding as under that the assessee co-operative society cannot be treated as a bank and is eligible for the deduction claimed u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act.
3.2.2 Respectfully following the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Yashwanthpur Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. (Supra) and the case of Sri Biluru Gurubasav Pattina Sahakari Sangha Niyamitha, Bagalkot (Supra), we hold that the assessee co- operative society is a credit co-operative society which is eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act and is not a bank, and, therefore, the provisions of sec. 80P(4) of the Act are not applicable. In this view of the matter, we find no reason to interfere with the impugned order of the ld CIT(A) on this issue. Consequently, the grounds raised by Revenue, being devoid of merit, are dismissed.
In the result, Revenue’s appeal for asst. year 2011-12 is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 7th June, 2017.
More judgments on Section 80P(2)(a)(i)
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- The Development Multipurpose Credit &… vs ITO Ward 2 (4), Porbandar, GujaratITA 458/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hislop College Employees Cooperative Credit… vs ITO Ward 2(3), NagpurITA 184/NAG/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026