AMFORGE INDUSTRIES,MUMBAI vs. ACIT-20(1), MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed for non-compliance with hearing notices, and the addition made by the AO was sustained. The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) did not adjudicate on merit and restored the case for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed a return of income. Subsequently, the case was reopened based on information that the assessee had taken accommodation entries for bogus purchases. The Assessing Officer added the entire purchase amount as bogus and finalized the assessment ex parte.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal without adjudicating on merit, and if the case should be remanded for fresh adjudication.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “A”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI AMARJIT SINGH & SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL
PER AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal of the assessee for the assessment year 2011-12 is directed against the order u/s 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 dated 09.10.2023 passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeal), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi.
Facts in brief are that the return of income declaring the total income of Rs.1,62,040/- was filed on 28th September, 2011. Subsequently, the case of the assessee was reopened on the basis of the information received from Maharashtra Sales-tax Department/DIGT (INV), Mumbai that the assessee had taken Amforge Industries, Mumbai. A.Y. 2011-12 accommodation entries in the form of bogus purchases from Hawala operators. The assessee has not made any compliance before the Assessing Officer, therefore, the AO has added the whole amount of purchases of Rs.1,32,99,193/- as bogus purchases to the total income of the assesse and assessment was finalized u/s 144 r.w.s.147 of the Act ex parte on 12th December, 2018.
Against the order of the Assessing Officer, the assessee has preferred appeal before the ld.CIT(A). The ld.CIT(A) has passed order u/s 250 of the Act on 9th October, 2023 and dismissed the appeal of the assessee for not making any compliance to the notices of hearing issued during the course of appellate proceedings and sustained the addition made by the AO.
Heard the ld. DR and perused the material on record. Without reiterating the facts as discussed above in this order, the ld.CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee without adjudicating on merit since the assessee has not made any compliance to the notices of hearing issued by the ld.CIT(A). Since the Assessing Officer has made 100% disallowance of purchases made by the assessee which was sustained by the ld.CIT(A), therefore, we consider it appropriate to restore the case to the file of the ld.CIT(A) for adjudicating on merit after providing three more opportunities of hearing to the assessee. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 16.10.2024.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026